Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 5, 109
eCollection

The Status of and Future Research Into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Need of Accurate Diagnosis, Objective Assessment, and Acknowledging Biological and Clinical Subgroups

Affiliations

The Status of and Future Research Into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Need of Accurate Diagnosis, Objective Assessment, and Acknowledging Biological and Clinical Subgroups

Frank N M Twisk. Front Physiol.

Abstract

Although Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) are used interchangeably, the diagnostic criteria define two distinct clinical entities. Cognitive impairment, (muscle) weakness, circulatory disturbances, marked variability of symptoms, and, above all, post-exertional malaise: a long-lasting increase of symptoms after a minor exertion, are distinctive symptoms of ME. This latter phenomenon separates ME, a neuro-immune illness, from chronic fatigue (syndrome), other disorders and deconditioning. The introduction of the label, but more importantly the diagnostic criteria for CFS have generated much confusion, mostly because chronic fatigue is a subjective and ambiguous notion. CFS was redefined in 1994 into unexplained (persistent or relapsing) chronic fatigue, accompanied by at least four out of eight symptoms, e.g., headaches and unrefreshing sleep. Most of the research into ME and/or CFS in the last decades was based upon the multivalent CFS criteria, which define a heterogeneous patient group. Due to the fact that fatigue and other symptoms are non-discriminative, subjective experiences, research has been hampered. Various authors have questioned the physiological nature of the symptoms and qualified ME/CFS as somatization. However, various typical symptoms can be assessed objectively using standardized methods. Despite subjective and unclear criteria and measures, research has observed specific abnormalities in ME/CFS repetitively, e.g., immunological abnormalities, oxidative and nitrosative stress, neurological anomalies, circulatory deficits and mitochondrial dysfunction. However, to improve future research standards and patient care, it is crucial that patients with post-exertional malaise (ME) and patients without this odd phenomenon are acknowledged as separate clinical entities that the diagnosis of ME and CFS in research and clinical practice is based upon accurate criteria and an objective assessment of characteristic symptoms, as much as possible that well-defined clinical and biological subgroups of ME and CFS patients are investigated in more detail, and that patients are monitored before, during and after interventions with objective measures and biomarkers.

Keywords: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; Myalgic Encephalomyelitis; assessment; diagnosis; immune system; post-exertional malaise; subgroups.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 12 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. (1978). Epidemic myalgic encephalomyelitis. Br. Med. J. 1, 1436–1437 10.1136/bmj.1.2791.1436-a - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aschbacher K., Adam E. K., Crofford L. J., Kemeny M. E., Demitrack M. A., Ben-Zvi A. (2012). Linking disease symptoms and subtypes with personalized systems-based phenotypes: a proof of concept study. Brain Behav. Immun. 26, 1047–1056 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.06.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College of ardiology, Benditt D. G., Ferguson D. W., Grubb B. P., Kapoor W. N., Kugler J., et al. (1996). Tilt table testing for assessing syncope. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 28, 263–275 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00236-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Sports Medicine. (2009). ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 8th Edn. Ambler, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
    1. Acheson E. D. (1959). The clinical syndrome variously called benign myalgic encephalomyelitis, Iceland disease and epidemic neuromyasthenia. Am. J. Med. 26, 569–595 10.1016/0002-9343(59)90280-3 - DOI - PubMed
Feedback