Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;21(2):300-8.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9981-z.

Automated Quantitative Pupillometry for the Prognostication of Coma After Cardiac Arrest


Automated Quantitative Pupillometry for the Prognostication of Coma After Cardiac Arrest

Tamarah Suys et al. Neurocrit Care. .


Background: Sedation and therapeutic hypothermia (TH) delay neurological responses and might reduce the accuracy of clinical examination to predict outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). We examined the accuracy of quantitative pupillary light reactivity (PLR), using an automated infrared pupillometry, to predict outcome of post-CA coma in comparison to standard PLR, EEG, and somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP).

Methods: We prospectively studied over a 1-year period (June 2012-June 2013) 50 consecutive comatose CA patients treated with TH (33 °C, 24 h). Quantitative PLR (expressed as the % of pupillary response to a calibrated light stimulus) and standard PLR were measured at day 1 (TH and sedation; on average 16 h after CA) and day 2 (normothermia, off sedation: on average 46 h after CA). Neurological outcome was assessed at 90 days with Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC), dichotomized as good (CPC 1-2) versus poor (CPC 3-5). Predictive performance was analyzed using area under the ROC curves (AUC).

Results: Patients with good outcome [n = 23 (46 %)] had higher quantitative PLR than those with poor outcome [n = 27; 16 (range 9-23) vs. 10 (1-30) % at day 1, and 20 (13-39) vs. 11 (1-55) % at day 2, both p < 0.001]. Best cut-off for outcome prediction of quantitative PLR was <13 %. The AUC to predict poor outcome was higher for quantitative than for standard PLR at both time points (day 1, 0.79 vs. 0.56, p = 0.005; day 2, 0.81 vs. 0.64, p = 0.006). Prognostic accuracy of quantitative PLR was comparable to that of EEG and SSEP (0.81 vs. 0.80 and 0.73, respectively, both p > 0.20).

Conclusions: Quantitative PLR is more accurate than standard PLR in predicting outcome of post-anoxic coma, irrespective of temperature and sedation, and has comparable prognostic accuracy than EEG and SSEP.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 15 articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Neurology. 2006 Jul 25;67(2):203-10 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1671-82 - PubMed
    1. Neurology. 2012 Mar 13;78(11):796-802 - PubMed
    1. Neurologist. 2007 Nov;13(6):369-75 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1252-7 - PubMed

Publication types


LinkOut - more resources