[Comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in the exploration of the infertility: analysis of the literature]
- PMID: 24767305
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.03.002
[Comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in the exploration of the infertility: analysis of the literature]
Abstract
Background: Fertiloscopy is a recent technique designed to explore the tubo-ovarian axis in unexplained infertility. It is a simple outpatient technique, allowing to perform operative procedures, but its position relative to laparoscopy is yet to be defined.
Material and methods: A thorough and extensive bibliographical search was undertaken to fully embrace the question, challenging Medline at the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Health Technology Assessment Database. All the retrieved articles were classified as either descriptive or comparative studies and evaluated on a set of criteria.
Results: Most of the papers described case series coming from a few teams, focusing mainly on the technical aspect of the procedure, like the access rate to the posterior cul-de-sac, the success rate in visualizing the pelvis, the complications rate (mainly rectal perforation), and its operative performance in drilling ovaries for resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome. Comparative studies numbered six trials. They all followed the same design, fertiloscopy preceding conventional laparoscopy in patients taken as their own control. The concordance rate between the two modalities reaches 80% in terms of tubal pathology, adherences and endometriosis, with an estimated reduction of laparoscopies varying from 40% to 93%.
Conclusion: The current literature shows a concordance between fertiloscopy and conventional laparoscopic findings for certain parameters in cases of tubal pathology, adherences and endometriosis. The relative positions of these two modalities in unexplained infertility still remain elusive.
Keywords: Adhesion; Adhérences; Cœlioscopie; Endometriosis; Endométriose; Fertiloscopie; Fertiloscopy; Hydrolaparascopie transvaginale; Infertility; Infertilité; Laparoscopie; Laparoscopy; Pathologie tubaire; Transvaginal hydrolaparascopy; Tubal pathology.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Similar articles
-
Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the 'FLY' (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study.Hum Reprod. 2003 Apr;18(4):834-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg180. Hum Reprod. 2003. PMID: 12660280 Clinical Trial.
-
[Diagnostic and operative fertiloscopy].Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Apr;59(2):175-81. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17505459 Review. Italian.
-
[Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy for infertility investigation: a retrospective study, about 262 patients].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Feb;42(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 21. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014. PMID: 24461467 French.
-
Prospective evaluation of the learning curve of fertiloscopy with and without ovarian drilling.Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Apr;30(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Jan 13. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015. PMID: 25691449
-
[Diagnosis accuracy of endoscopy (laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, fertiloscopy, cystoscopy, colonoscopy) in case of endometriosis: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Mar;46(3):200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Mar 9. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 29530560 Review. French.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
