A cost-analysis model for anticoagulant treatment in the hospital setting
- PMID: 24773068
- DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2014.914032
A cost-analysis model for anticoagulant treatment in the hospital setting
Abstract
Background: Rivaroxaban is the first oral factor Xa inhibitor approved in the US to reduce the risk of stroke and blood clots among people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, treat deep vein thrombosis (DVT), treat pulmonary embolism (PE), reduce the risk of recurrence of DVT and PE, and prevent DVT and PE after knee or hip replacement surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the costs from a hospital perspective of treating patients with rivaroxaban vs other anticoagulant agents across these five populations.
Methods: An economic model was developed using treatment regimens from the ROCKET-AF, EINSTEIN-DVT and PE, and RECORD1-3 randomized clinical trials. The distribution of hospital admissions used in the model across the different populations was derived from the 2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project database. The model compared total costs of anticoagulant treatment, monitoring, inpatient stay, and administration for patients receiving rivaroxaban vs other anticoagulant agents. The length of inpatient stay (LOS) was determined from the literature.
Results: Across all populations, rivaroxaban was associated with an overall mean cost savings of $1520 per patient. The largest cost savings associated with rivaroxaban was observed in patients with DVT or PE ($6205 and $2742 per patient, respectively). The main driver of the cost savings resulted from the reduction in LOS associated with rivaroxaban, contributing to ∼90% of the total savings. Furthermore, the overall mean anticoagulant treatment cost was lower for rivaroxaban vs the reference groups.
Limitations: The distribution of patients across indications used in the model may not be generalizable to all hospitals, where practice patterns may vary, and average LOS cost may not reflect the actual reimbursements that hospitals received.
Conclusion: From a hospital perspective, the use of rivaroxaban may be associated with cost savings when compared to other anticoagulant treatments due to lower drug cost and shorter LOS associated with rivaroxaban.
Keywords: Anticoagulant; Cost-analysis; Economic model; Rivaroxaban.
Similar articles
-
Length of stay and economic consequences with rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with DVT and PE: findings from the North American EINSTEIN clinical trial program.J Med Econ. 2014 Oct;17(10):691-5. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.946993. Epub 2014 Aug 4. J Med Econ. 2014. PMID: 25065536
-
Medical costs in the US of clinical events associated with oral anticoagulant (OAC) use compared to warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients ≥75 and <75 years of age, based on the ARISTOTLE, RE-LY, and ROCKET-AF trials.J Med Econ. 2013 Sep;16(9):1163-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.826664. Epub 2013 Aug 8. J Med Econ. 2013. PMID: 23869941
-
Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.J Med Econ. 2014 Jan;17(1):52-64. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.858634. Epub 2013 Nov 14. J Med Econ. 2014. PMID: 24156243
-
The role of rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;19(6):526-32. doi: 10.1177/1074248414525505. Epub 2014 Mar 21. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014. PMID: 24659084 Review.
-
Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: a single technology appraisal.Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13 Suppl 3:43-8. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/07. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19846028 Review.
Cited by
-
Shorter Hospital Stays and Lower Costs for Rivaroxaban Compared With Warfarin for Venous Thrombosis Admissions.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 6;5(10):e003788. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003788. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27792638 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
