Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing

Anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;69(7):717-22. doi: 10.1111/anae.12678. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

Abstract

We evaluated whether pulse pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Fifty-nine elective thoracic surgical patients were studied before induction of general anaesthesia. After volume expansion with hydroxyethyl starch 6 ml.kg(-1) , patients were defined as responders by a ≥ 15% increase in the cardiac index. Haemodynamic variables were measured before and after volume expansion and pulse pressure variations were calculated during tidal breathing and during forced inspiratory breathing. Median (IQR [range]) pulse pressure variation during forced inspiratory breathing was significantly higher in responders (n = 29) than in non-responders (n = 30) before volume expansion (18.2 (IQR 14.7-18.2 [9.3-31.3])% vs. 10.1 (IQR 8.3-12.6 [4.8-21.1])%, respectively, p < 0.001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve revealed that pulse pressure variation during forced inspiratory breathing could predict fluid responsiveness (area under the curve 0.910, p < 0.0001). Pulse pressure variation measured during forced inspiratory breathing can be used to guide fluid management in spontaneously breathing patients.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Blood Pressure / physiology*
  • Cardiac Output / physiology
  • Female
  • Fluid Therapy
  • Hemodynamics / physiology
  • Humans
  • Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives / administration & dosage
  • Inspiratory Capacity / physiology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Plasma Substitutes / administration & dosage
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • ROC Curve
  • Reference Values
  • Respiration*
  • Respiration, Artificial / methods*
  • Stroke Volume / physiology
  • Tidal Volume / physiology*

Substances

  • Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives
  • Plasma Substitutes