Advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in extremely obese women (BMI>35) with early-stage endometrial cancer: a multicenter study

Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2497-502.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for treatment of extremely obese women with early-stage endometrial cancer.

Materials and methods: Seventy-five extremely obese patients with Body Mass Index >35 kg/m(2) and clinical stage I endometrial cancer underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and in all cases we performed systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy by laparoscopy (mean BMI of 38±7.3 kg/m(2)) or laparotomy (mean BMI of 39±8.1 kg/m(2)).

Results: In two (4.4%) patients of the laparoscopy group we observed a port site haematoma that was resolved without a second surgery. In three patients of the laparotomy-group, we observed dehiscence of the abdominal suture with surgical site infection that was re-sutured.

Conclusion: Laparoscopy can be considered a safe and effective therapeutic procedure for managing early-stage endometrial cancer in extremely obese women with a lower complication rate, lower surgical site infection and postoperative hospitalization.

Keywords: Endometrial cancer; hysterectomy; laparoscopy; lymphadenectomy; obese women.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / complications*
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / pathology
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy / adverse effects
  • Hysterectomy / methods
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects*
  • Laparotomy / adverse effects*
  • Lymph Node Excision / adverse effects
  • Lymph Node Excision / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Obesity / complications*
  • Obesity / surgery
  • Ovariectomy / adverse effects
  • Ovariectomy / methods
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Retrospective Studies