Breast-specific gamma imaging is a cost effective and efficacious imaging modality when compared with MRI

Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):698-701; discussion 701. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

Abstract

Background: Both MRI and breast-specific gamma imaging are tools for surgical planning in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is used less frequently although it is of similar utility and lower cost. We compared the diagnostic and cost efficacy of BSGI with MRI.

Methods: Retrospective review of 1,480 BSGIs was performed in a community breast health center, 539 had a new diagnosis of cancer, 75 patients having both MRI and BSGI performed within 2 months of each other. Institutional charges for BSGI ($850) and MRI ($3,381) were noted.

Results: BSGI had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 73%, positive predictive value of 78%, and negative predictive value of 90%. This compared favorably with MRI that had sensitivity of 89%, specificity 54%, positive predictive value 67%, and negative predictive value 83%. The accuracy of BSGI was higher at 82% vs MRI at 72%. Total cost of MRI imaging was $253,575 vs BSGI at $63,750.

Conclusions: BSGI is a cost-effective and accurate imaging study for further evaluation of dense breast tissue and new diagnosis of cancer.

Keywords: BSGI; Breast cancer; Imaging cost; MRI.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Breast Neoplasms / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Gamma Rays*
  • Hospital Charges / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / economics*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Radiopharmaceuticals* / economics
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi* / economics

Substances

  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi