Burrowing behavior in mud and sand of morphologically divergent polychaete species (Annelida: Orbiniidae)
- PMID: 24797095
- DOI: 10.1086/BBLv226n2p131
Burrowing behavior in mud and sand of morphologically divergent polychaete species (Annelida: Orbiniidae)
Abstract
Muddy and sandy sediments have different physical properties. Muds are cohesive elastic solids, whereas granular beach sands are non-cohesive porous media. Infaunal organisms such as worms that burrow through sediments therefore face different mechanical challenges that potentially lead to a variety of burrowing strategies and morphologies. In this study we compared three morphologically distinct polychaete species representing different clades in the family Orbiniidae and related differences in their burrowing behaviors and morphologies to their natural environments (mud or sand). Worms burrowed in transparent analogs for muds and sands, and kinematic analysis showed differences both among species and between materials. Leitoscoloplos pugettensis lives in mud and burrows by fracture, using its pointed head to concentrate stress at the tip of the burrow. Naineris dendritica lives in sand and uses its broader head that fluctuates in width over a burrowing cycle to decrease backward slipping in sand, potentially preventing burrow collapse. Orbinia johnsoni lives in sand and uses internal body expansions to pack sand grains, another mechanism to prevent burrow collapse. By combining data from species and materials to obtain a broad range of burrowing velocities, we show that burrowing worms control their velocity by increasing or decreasing their burrowing frequency rather than by altering cycle distance as shown previously for crawling earthworms. This study demonstrates how fairly small evolutionary divergences in morphologies and behaviors facilitate locomotion in environments with different physical constraints.
Similar articles
-
Meandering worms: mechanics of undulatory burrowing in muds.Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 27;280(1757):20122948. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2948. Print 2013 Apr 22. Proc Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23446526 Free PMC article.
-
Kinematics of burrowing by peristalsis in granular sands.J Exp Biol. 2018 May 22;221(Pt 10):jeb167759. doi: 10.1242/jeb.167759. J Exp Biol. 2018. PMID: 29636410
-
The biomechanics of burrowing and boring.J Exp Biol. 2015 Jan 15;218(Pt 2):176-83. doi: 10.1242/jeb.086983. J Exp Biol. 2015. PMID: 25609781
-
Peromyscus burrowing: A model system for behavioral evolution.Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Jan;61:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017. PMID: 27496333 Review.
-
Diet of worms emended: an update of polychaete feeding guilds.Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2015;7:497-520. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-020007. Epub 2014 Sep 17. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2015. PMID: 25251269 Review.
Cited by
-
The Meioflume: A New System for Observing the Interstitial Behavior of Meiofauna.Integr Org Biol. 2024 May 25;6(1):obae016. doi: 10.1093/iob/obae016. eCollection 2024. Integr Org Biol. 2024. PMID: 38883566 Free PMC article.
-
Fundamentals of burrowing in soft animals and robots.Front Robot AI. 2023 Jan 30;10:1057876. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1057876. eCollection 2023. Front Robot AI. 2023. PMID: 36793873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mechanistic framework for reduced-order models in soft materials: Application to three-dimensional granular intrusion.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 24;120(4):e2214017120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214017120. Epub 2023 Jan 17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 36649408 Free PMC article.
-
Transparent soil microcosms for live-cell imaging and non-destructive stable isotope probing of soil microorganisms.Elife. 2020 Nov 3;9:e56275. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56275. Elife. 2020. PMID: 33140722 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
