Area-level factors associated with electronic health record adoption and meaningful use in the Regional Extension Center Program
- PMID: 24798687
- PMCID: PMC4215037
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002347
Area-level factors associated with electronic health record adoption and meaningful use in the Regional Extension Center Program
Abstract
Objective: To identify area-level correlates of electronic health record (EHR) adoption and meaningful use (MU) among primary care providers (PCPs) enrolled in the Regional Extension Center (REC) Program.
Materials and methods: County-level data on 2013 EHR adoption and MU among REC-enrolled PCPs were obtained from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and linked with other county-level data sources including the Area Resource File, American Community Survey, and Federal Communications Commission's broadband availability database. Hierarchical models with random intercepts for RECs were employed to assess associations between a broad set of area-level factors and county-level rates of EHR adoption and MU.
Results: Among the 2715 counties examined, the average county-level EHR adoption and MU rates for REC-enrolled PCPs were 87.5% and 54.2%, respectively. Community health center presence and Medicaid enrollment concentration were positively associated with EHR adoption, while metropolitan status and Medicare Advantage enrollment concentration were positively associated with MU. Health professional shortage area status and minority concentration were negatively associated with EHR adoption and MU.
Discussion: Increased financial incentives in areas with greater concentrations of Medicaid and Medicare enrollees may be encouraging EHR adoption and MU among REC-enrolled PCPs. Disparities in EHR adoption and MU in some low-resource and underserved areas remain a concern.
Conclusions: Federal efforts to spur EHR adoption and MU have demonstrated some early success; however, some geographic variations in EHR diffusion indicate that greater attention needs to be paid to ensuring equitable uptake and use of EHRs throughout the US.
Keywords: HITECH act; diffusion of innovations; disparities; electronic health records; geographic variations.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Similar articles
-
The Impact of Market Factors on Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records Among Primary Care Providers: Evidence From Florida Using Resource Dependence Theory and Information Uncertainty Perspective.Med Care. 2024 Apr 1;62(4):256-262. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001980. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Med Care. 2024. PMID: 38447010
-
Rural primary care practices and meaningful use of electronic health records: the role of Regional Extension Centers.J Rural Health. 2014 Summer;30(3):244-51. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12050. Epub 2013 Sep 30. J Rural Health. 2014. PMID: 24118180
-
The Health IT Regional Extension Center Program: evolution and lessons for health care transformation.Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1 Pt 2):421-37. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12140. Epub 2013 Dec 21. Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 24359032 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):15-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615807. Epub 2018 Jan 10. Appl Clin Inform. 2018. PMID: 29320797 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.J Med Syst. 2018 Sep 29;42(11):214. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1075-6. J Med Syst. 2018. PMID: 30269237 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Market Factors on Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records Among Primary Care Providers: Evidence From Florida Using Resource Dependence Theory and Information Uncertainty Perspective.Med Care. 2024 Apr 1;62(4):256-262. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001980. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Med Care. 2024. PMID: 38447010
-
The impact of county-level factors on meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) among primary care providers.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0295435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295435. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38271332 Free PMC article.
-
Growing Disparities in Patient-Provider Messaging: Trend Analysis Before and After Supportive Policy.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 7;21(10):e14976. doi: 10.2196/14976. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31593539 Free PMC article.
-
Facility and Regional Factors Associated With the New Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in Japan: Nationwide Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jun 14;7(2):e14026. doi: 10.2196/14026. JMIR Med Inform. 2019. PMID: 31199307 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.J Med Syst. 2018 May 29;42(7):121. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0971-0. J Med Syst. 2018. PMID: 29845400
References
-
- Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001
-
- Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, et al. . The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:464–71 - PubMed
-
- Georgiou A, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J, et al. . When requests become orders—a formative investigation into the impact of a computerized physician order entry system on a pathology laboratory service. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:583–91 - PubMed
-
- Spetz J, Keane D. Information technology implementation in a rural hospital: a cautionary tale. J Healthc Manag 2009;54:337–47; discussion 348 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
