Comparative study of the efficacy of the canalith repositioning procedure versus the vertigo treatment and rehabilitation chair

Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Jul;134(7):704-8. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.899711. Epub 2014 May 7.

Abstract

Conclusion: Vertigo treatment and rehabilitation chair (TRV) may be suggested as the first choice for patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (p-BPPV).

Objective: To investigate the short- and long-term treatment efficacy of the canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) versus TRV for patients with p-BPPV.

Methods: A total of 165 patients with unilateral p-BPPV were assigned to either the CRP group or the TRV group. Patients were assessed at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after their first treatment. The numbers of treatment sessions required for successful repositioning in both groups at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months were recorded.

Results: Treatment efficacy of patients in the TRV group was significantly better than that of patients in the CRP group 1 week after the first treatment. The number of treatment sessions needed for successful repositioning was significantly lower in the TRV group than in the CRP group at 4 weeks and 3 months after the first treatment.

Keywords: Vertigo; recurrence; short-term efficacy.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo / therapy*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Musculoskeletal Manipulations*
  • Nystagmus, Physiologic
  • Otolithic Membrane
  • Patient Positioning / instrumentation*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Rehabilitation / instrumentation
  • Semicircular Canals
  • Treatment Outcome