Do-not-resuscitate status and observational comparative effectiveness research in patients with septic shock*
- PMID: 24810532
- PMCID: PMC4266548
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000403
Do-not-resuscitate status and observational comparative effectiveness research in patients with septic shock*
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the importance of including do-not-resuscitate status in critical care observational comparative effectiveness research.
Design: Retrospective analysis.
Setting: All California hospitals participating in the 2007 California State Inpatient Database, which provides do-not-resuscitate status within the first 24 hours of admission.
Patients: Septic shock present at admission.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: We investigated the association of early do-not-resuscitate status with in-hospital mortality among patients with septic shock. We also examined the strength of confounding of do-not-resuscitate status on the association between activated protein C therapy and mortality, an association with conflicting results between observational and randomized studies. We identified 24,408 patients with septic shock; 19.6% had a do-not-resuscitate order. Compared with patients without a do-not-resuscitate order, those with a do-not-resuscitate order were significantly more likely to be older (75 ± 14 vs 67 ± 16 yr) and white (62% vs 53%), with more acute organ failures (1.44 ± 1.15 vs 1.38 ± 1.15), but fewer inpatient interventions (1.0 ± 1.0 vs 1.4 ± 1.1). Adding do-not-resuscitate status to a model with 47 covariates improved mortality discrimination (c-statistic, 0.73-0.76; p < 0.001). Addition of do-not-resuscitate status to a multivariable model assessing the association between activated protein C and mortality resulted in a 9% shift in the activated protein C effect estimate toward the null (odds ratio from 0.78 [95% CI, 0.62-0.99], p = 0.04, to 0.85 [0.67-1.08], p = 0.18).
Conclusions: Among patients with septic shock, do-not-resuscitate status acts as a strong confounder that may inform past discrepancies between observational and randomized studies of activated protein C. Inclusion of early do-not-resuscitate status into more administrative databases may improve observational comparative effectiveness methodology.
Figures
Comment in
-
Why do-not-resuscitate orders matter in comparative effectiveness research*.Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2138-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000450. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 25126803 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
High Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in East Asia.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0159501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159501. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27416064 Free PMC article.
-
Why do-not-resuscitate orders matter in comparative effectiveness research*.Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2138-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000450. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 25126803 No abstract available.
-
Risk factors for mortality despite early protocolized resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 26. J Crit Care. 2016. PMID: 26611382
-
Quantifying the Mortality Impact of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the ICU.Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):1019-1027. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002312. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28328651 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Vasopressor Exposure and Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1445-1453. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004476. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32706559
Cited by
-
Racial disparities in end-of-life suffering within surgical intensive care units.Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Sep 3;9(1):e001367. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001367. eCollection 2024. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024. PMID: 39296594 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of ICD codes to identify do-not-resuscitate orders among older adults with heart failure: A single center study.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 13;18(3):e0283045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283045. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36913366 Free PMC article.
-
Overlooked Shortcomings of Observational Studies of Interventions in Coronavirus Disease 2019: An Illustrated Review for the Clinician.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;8(8):ofab317. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab317. eCollection 2021 Aug. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34377723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions in people admitted with suspected COVID-19: Secondary analysis of the PRIEST observational cohort study.Resuscitation. 2021 Jul;164:130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.028. Epub 2021 May 4. Resuscitation. 2021. PMID: 33961960 Free PMC article.
-
Death and do-not-resuscitate order in the emergency department: A single-center three-year retrospective study in the Chinese mainland.World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(4):231-237. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.04.005. World J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 33014219 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lu CY. Observational studies: A review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May;63(5):691–7. - PubMed
-
- Concato J. Study design and “evidence” in patient-oriented research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 1;187(11):1167–72. - PubMed
-
- La Puma J, Silverstein MD, Stocking CB, Roland D, Siegler M. Life-sustaining treatment. A prospective study of patients with DNR orders in a teaching hospital. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Oct;148(10):2193–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
