Functional plasticity in childhood brain disorders: when, what, how, and whom to assess

Neuropsychol Rev. 2014 Dec;24(4):389-408. doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9261-x. Epub 2014 May 13.

Abstract

At every point in the lifespan, the brain balances malleable processes representing neural plasticity that promote change with homeostatic processes that promote stability. Whether a child develops typically or with brain injury, his or her neural and behavioral outcome is constructed through transactions between plastic and homeostatic processes and the environment. In clinical research with children in whom the developing brain has been malformed or injured, behavioral outcomes provide an index of the result of plasticity, homeostasis, and environmental transactions. When should we assess outcome in relation to age at brain insult, time since brain insult, and age of the child at testing? What should we measure? Functions involving reacting to the past and predicting the future, as well as social-affective skills, are important. How should we assess outcome? Information from performance variability, direct measures and informants, overt and covert measures, and laboratory and ecological measures should be considered. In whom are we assessing outcome? Assessment should be cognizant of individual differences in gene, socio-economic status (SES), parenting, nutrition, and interpersonal supports, which are moderators that interact with other factors influencing functional outcome.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Brain / pathology
  • Brain / physiopathology
  • Brain Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Brain Diseases / physiopathology
  • Brain Diseases / psychology
  • Brain Diseases / therapy*
  • Child
  • Child Development / physiology
  • Humans
  • Neuronal Plasticity*
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care*