Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):204-14.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1623.

Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial

Anthony Jerant et al. Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Interventions tailored to sociopsychological factors associated with health behaviors have promise for reducing colorectal cancer screening disparities, but limited research has assessed their impact in multiethnic populations. We examined whether an interactive multimedia computer program (IMCP) tailored to expanded health belief model sociopsychological factors could promote colorectal cancer screening in a multiethnic sample.

Methods: We undertook a randomized controlled trial, comparing an IMCP tailored to colorectal cancer screening self-efficacy, knowledge, barriers, readiness, test preference, and experiences with a nontailored informational program, both delivered before office visits. The primary outcome was record-documented colorectal cancer screening during a 12-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included postvisit sociopsychological factor status and discussion, as well as clinician recommendation of screening during office visits. We enrolled 1,164 patients stratified by ethnicity and language (49.3% non-Hispanic, 27.2% Hispanic/English, 23.4% Hispanic/Spanish) from 26 offices around 5 centers (Sacramento, California; Rochester and the Bronx, New York; Denver, Colorado; and San Antonio, Texas).

Results: Adjusting for ethnicity/language, study center, and the previsit value of the dependent variable, compared with control patients, the IMCP led to significantly greater colorectal cancer screening knowledge, self-efficacy, readiness, test preference specificity, discussion, and recommendation. During the followup period, 132 (23%) IMCP and 123 (22%) control patients received screening (adjusted difference = 0.5 percentage points, 95% CI -4.3 to 5.3). IMCP effects did not differ significantly by ethnicity/language.

Conclusions: Sociopsychological factor tailoring was no more effective than nontailored information in encouraging colorectal cancer screening in a multiethnic sample, despite enhancing sociopsychological factors and visit behaviors associated with screening. The utility of sociopsychological tailoring in addressing screening disparities remains uncertain.

Keywords: Hispanic Americans; colorectal neoplasms; computer-assisted instruction; early detection of cancer; expanded health belief model; health behavior; health care disparities; health education; health promotion; outcome and process assessment (health care); patient acceptance of health care; randomized controlled trial; software.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequence and content of tailored IMCP and nontailored control interventions for colorectal screening. CRC = colorectal cancer; FOBT = fecal occult blood test; IMCP = interactive multimedia computer program. Note: shaded boxes indicate keying individually tailored modules of experimental IMCP. aBasic structure of tailoring in each module: (1) give all users brief feedback tailored to their responses to relevant questions; (2) offer the option to view more-detailed information.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow of participants through the trial. CRC = colorectal cancer; IMCP = interactive multimedia computer program.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curve for receipt of colorectal cancer screening after intervention according to study group. IMCP = interactive multimedia computer program. Note: Screening was ascertained by medical record review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20(8):1611–1621 - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637 - PubMed
    1. Jerant AF, Arellanes RE, Franks P. Factors associated with Hispanic/non-Hispanic white colorectal cancer screening disparities. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1241–1245 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175–183 - PubMed
    1. Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, et al. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):97–118 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms