The retreat from locative overgeneralisation errors: a novel verb grammaticality judgment study

PLoS One. 2014 May 15;9(5):e97634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097634. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Whilst some locative verbs alternate between the ground- and figure-locative constructions (e.g. Lisa sprayed the flowers with water/Lisa sprayed water onto the flowers), others are restricted to one construction or the other (e.g. *Lisa filled water into the cup/*Lisa poured the cup with water). The present study investigated two proposals for how learners (aged 5-6, 9-10 and adults) acquire this restriction, using a novel-verb-learning grammaticality-judgment paradigm. In support of the semantic verb class hypothesis, participants in all age groups used the semantic properties of novel verbs to determine the locative constructions (ground/figure/both) in which they could and could not appear. In support of the frequency hypothesis, participants' tolerance of overgeneralisation errors decreased with each increasing level of verb frequency (novel/low/high). These results underline the need to develop an integrated account of the roles of semantics and frequency in the retreat from argument structure overgeneralisation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Generalization, Psychological
  • Humans
  • Judgment
  • Language Development*
  • Language*
  • Male
  • Psycholinguistics*
  • Semantics
  • Verbal Learning
  • Vocabulary
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study was funded by Grant RES-062-23-0931 from the Economic and Social Research Council (http://www.esrc.ac.uk/) and Grant RPG-158 from the Leverhulme Trust (http://www.leverhulme.ac.uk/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.