Background: Despite sparse clinical data, current atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines favor amiodarone as a drug of choice for patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
Objective: This study tested the hypothesis that patients with persistent AF and LVH on nonamiodarone antiarrhythmics have higher mortality compared to patients on amiodarone.
Methods: In an observational cohort analysis of patients who underwent cardioversion for AF, patients with LVH, defined as left ventricular wall thickness ≥1.4 cm, by echocardiogram prior to their first cardioversion, were included; clinical data, including antiarrhythmic drugs and ejection fraction (LVEF), were collected. Mortality, determined via the Social Security Death Index, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models to determine whether antiarrhythmic drugs were associated with higher mortality.
Results: In 3,926 patients, echocardiographic wall thickness was available in 1,399 (age 66.8 ± 11.8 years, 67% male, LVEF 46 ± 15%, septum 1.3 ± 0.4, posterior wall 1.2 ± 0.2 cm), and 537 (38%) had LVH ≥1.4 cm. Among 537 patients with LVH, mean age was 67.5 ± 11.7 years, 76.4% were males, and mean LVEF was 48.3 ± 13.3%. Amiodarone was associated with lower survival (log rank P = 0.001), including after adjusting for age, LVEF, and coronary artery disease (P = 0.023). In propensity-score matched cohorts with LVH treated with no drugs, nonamiodarone antiarrhythmic drugs (non-AADs), or amiodarone (N = 65 each group), there was early lower survival in patients on amiodarone (P = 0.05).
Conclusions: Patients with persistent AF and LVH on non-AADs do not have higher mortality compared to patients on amiodarone. Importantly, these findings do not support amiodarone as a superior choice in patients with LVH.
Keywords: antiarrhythmic drugs; atrial fibrillation; left ventricular hypertrophy; mortality.
©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.