Determination of optimal drug dose and light dose index to achieve minimally invasive focal ablation of localised prostate cancer using WST11-vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy
- PMID: 24841929
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.12816
Determination of optimal drug dose and light dose index to achieve minimally invasive focal ablation of localised prostate cancer using WST11-vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy
Abstract
Objective: To determine the optimal drug and light dose for prostate ablation using WST11 (TOOKAD Soluble) for vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy in men with low-risk prostate cancer.
Patients and methods: In all, 42 men with low-risk prostate cancer were enrolled in the study but two who underwent anaesthesia for the procedure did not receive the drug or light dose. Thus, 40 men received a single dose of 2, 4 or 6 mg/kg WST11 activated by 200 J/cm light at 753 nm. WST11 was given as a 10-min intravenous infusion. The light dose was delivered using cylindrical diffusing fibres within hollow plastic needles positioned in the prostate using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance and a brachytherapy template. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to assess treatment effect at 7 days, with assessment of urinary function (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]), sexual function (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) and adverse events at 7 days, 1, 3 and 6 months after VTP. TRUS-guided biopsies were taken at 6 months.
Results: In all, 39 of the 40 treated men completed the follow-up. The Day-7 MRI showed maximal treatment effect (95% of the planned treatment volume) in men who had a WST11 dose of 4 mg/kg, light dose of 200 J/cm and light density index (LDI) of >1. In the 12 men treated with these parameters, the negative biopsy rate was 10/12 (83%) at 6 months, compared with 10/26 (45%) for the men who had either a different drug dose (10 men) or an LDI of <1 (16). Transient urinary symptoms were seen in most of the men, with no significant difference in IPSS score between baseline and 6 months after VTP. IIEF scores were not significantly different between baseline and 6 months after VTP.
Conclusion: Treatment with 4 mg/kg TOOKAD Soluble activated by 753 nm light at a dose of 200 J/cm and an LDI of >1 resulted in treatment effect in 95% of the planned treatment volume and a negative biopsy rate at 6 months of 10/12 men (83%).
Keywords: TOOKAD; VTP; cancer; focal therapy; prostate.
© 2014 The Authors BJU International © 2014 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
TOOKAD(®) Soluble vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy: determination of optimal treatment conditions and assessment of effects in patients with localised prostate cancer.BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):766-74. doi: 10.1111/bju.12265. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 24028764 Clinical Trial.
-
TOOKAD® Soluble focal therapy: pooled analysis of three phase II studies assessing the minimally invasive ablation of localized prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2015 Jul;33(7):945-53. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1505-8. Epub 2015 Feb 25. World J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25712310 Free PMC article.
-
Final Results of a Phase I/II Multicenter Trial of WST11 Vascular Targeted Photodynamic Therapy for Hemi-Ablation of the Prostate in Men with Unilateral Low Risk Prostate Cancer Performed in the United States.J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1096-104. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.113. Epub 2016 Jun 9. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27291652 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in low-risk prostate cancer. A literature review].Prog Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;29(8-9):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 29. Prog Urol. 2019. PMID: 31266699 Review. French.
-
Treatment of localized prostate cancer using WST-09 and WST-11 mediated vascular targeted photodynamic therapy-A review.Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2015 Dec;12(4):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2015. PMID: 26467273 Review.
Cited by
-
Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities.Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 23;12:980239. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980239. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36212416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-Intensity Focused-Ultrasound Focal Therapy Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparison of Oncological and Functional Outcomes in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 9;12(2):251. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020251. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35207739 Free PMC article.
-
Prospect of Prostate Cancer Treatment: Armed CAR-T or Combination Therapy.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 15;14(4):967. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040967. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35205714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Focal therapy for primary and salvage prostate cancer treatment: a narrative review.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jul;10(7):3144-3154. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1212. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34430417 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, irreversible electroporation, and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;26(3):461-484. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01847-y. Epub 2021 Jan 2. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33387088
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
