Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;39(3):513-7.
doi: 10.1007/s12038-014-9429-9.

Phylogenetic diversity of Mesorhizobium in chickpea

Affiliations

Phylogenetic diversity of Mesorhizobium in chickpea

Dong Hyun Kim et al. J Biosci. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Crop domestication, in general, has reduced genetic diversity in cultivated gene pool of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as compared with wild species (C. reticulatum, C. bijugum). To explore impact of domestication on symbiosis, 10 accessions of chickpeas, including 4 accessions of C. arietinum, and 3 accessions of each of C. reticulatum and C. bijugum species, were selected and DNAs were extracted from their nodules. To distinguish chickpea symbiont, preliminary sequences analysis was attempted with 9 genes (16S rRNA, atpD, dnaJ, glnA, gyrB, nifH, nifK, nodD and recA) of which 3 genes (gyrB, nifK and nodD) were selected based on sufficient sequence diversity for further phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic analysis and sequence diversity for 3 genes demonstrated that sequences from C. reticulatum were more diverse. Nodule occupancy by dominant symbiont also indicated that C. reticulatum (60 percent) could have more various symbionts than cultivated chickpea (80 percent). The study demonstrated that wild chickpeas (C. reticulatum) could be used for selecting more diverse symbionts in the field conditions and it implies that chickpea domestication affected symbiosis negatively in addition to reducing genetic diversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Biotechnol. 2011 Aug 20;155(1):11-9 - PubMed
    1. Science. 2004 Sep 17;305(5691):1786-9 - PubMed
    1. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Nov;66(2):391-400 - PubMed
    1. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012 Sep;35(6):359-67 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2013 Jul 4;499(7456):23-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources