Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes

Surg Today. 2015 May;45(5):537-48. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2. Epub 2014 May 22.

Abstract

Purpose: (1) To survey the dissemination of SILC; (2) to determine which SILC method has become mainstream; (3) to determine whether the characteristic complications vary according to the type of procedure.

Methods: An electronic search of PubMed, Databases@Ovid, and SciVerse Scopus between 2003/01/01 and 2012/12/31 was performed.

Results: The peak number of annually published articles was 70 in 2011. The most common procedures were single skin incision, the use of a SILS Port(®), suture suspension and a 5-mm oblique scope. The intraoperative complications rate was 1.69 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 213/5283 cases. According to the surgical procedure, five factors (approach; P = 0.0017, gallbladder anchorage; P < 0.001, size; P = 0.049 and type; P < 0.001 of the scope, and size of the clip applier; P = 0.074) significantly affected the incidence of wound infection. The incidence of wound seroma/bleeding was significantly influenced by gallbladder anchorage (P = 0.009), the use of curved/articulated instruments (P = 0.048), and the diameter of the clip applier (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: To determine the best operative procedure for SILC, an analysis of uniform operative procedures is needed.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / instrumentation
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / methods*
  • Databases, Bibliographic*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Intraoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Surgical Wound Infection / epidemiology
  • Treatment Outcome