Postscript: research agenda to guide the next generation of public reports for consumers
- PMID: 24860123
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558714535982
Postscript: research agenda to guide the next generation of public reports for consumers
Abstract
There is significant interest in building the next generation of public reporting tools that will more effectively engage consumers and better enable them to make use of comparative performance information when selecting a provider. Demand for public reporting tools that make health care cost and quality information transparent is fueled by a variety of market forces underway. A host of public reporting efforts and studies have identified a number of challenges, highlighting that we still do not understand how best to design public reports to meet the needs of the consumer. We identify five areas for additional research that, if addressed, could foster better design and delivery of quality and cost information to consumers.
Keywords: consumer engagement in quality; health care decision making; public reporting; report cards; transparency.
© The Author(s) 2014.
Similar articles
-
Public reporting of provider performance at a crossroads in the United States: summary of current barriers and recommendations on how to move forward.Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):5S-16S. doi: 10.1177/1077558714535980. Epub 2014 May 27. Med Care Res Rev. 2014. PMID: 24871273
-
England's Experience incorporating "anecdotal" reports from consumers into their national reporting system: lessons for the United States of what to do or not to do?Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):65S-80S. doi: 10.1177/1077558714535470. Epub 2014 May 16. Med Care Res Rev. 2014. PMID: 24836765
-
Context-based strategies for engaging consumers with public reports about health care providers.Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):17S-37S. doi: 10.1177/1077558713493118. Epub 2013 Jul 1. Med Care Res Rev. 2014. PMID: 23819945 Free PMC article.
-
What do consumers want and need to know in making health care choices?Med Care Res Rev. 1999;56 Suppl 1:67-102; discussion 103-12. doi: 10.1177/1077558799056001S04. Med Care Res Rev. 1999. PMID: 10354679 Review.
-
Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research.Milbank Q. 1997;75(3):395-414. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00061. Milbank Q. 1997. PMID: 9290635 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Perspectives of Center-Specific Reporting in Kidney Failure Care: An Australian Qualitative Study.Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Jan 10;9(4):843-852. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.01.001. eCollection 2024 Apr. Kidney Int Rep. 2024. PMID: 38765598 Free PMC article.
-
Web-Based Public Reporting as a Decision-Making Tool for Consumers of Long-Term Care in the United States and the United Kingdom: Systematic Analysis of Report Cards.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 14;7:e44382. doi: 10.2196/44382. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 38096004 Free PMC article.
-
Referring physicians' intention to use hospital report cards for hospital referral purposes in the presence or absence of patient-reported outcomes: a randomized trial.Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;25(2):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01587-6. Epub 2023 Apr 13. Eur J Health Econ. 2024. PMID: 37052802 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public release of hospital quality data for referral practices in Germany: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Health Econ Rev. 2017 Sep 26;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0171-5. Health Econ Rev. 2017. PMID: 28952136 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Awareness, Usage and Impact of Hospital Report Cards in the US.Patient. 2017 Dec;10(6):729-738. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0243-y. Patient. 2017. PMID: 28447273
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
