Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines
- PMID: 24865409
- PMCID: PMC4129969
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4668
Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines
Abstract
Background: This study investigates factors that are associated with nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in Utah, a state where mammography screening rates have remained consistently lower than national averages.
Methods: We examined data on reported mammography use among women aged 40-74 years from the 2008 and 2010 Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n=5,197, weighted n=417,064). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of individual-level and geographic (travel time to nearest mammography facility, geographic accessibility, and rural/urban residence) factors on the odds of a woman not reporting receiving a mammogram in the last 2 years.
Results: In 2008 and 2010, a disproportionate number of women aged 40-49 (43.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 39.9%-46.3%) reported not receiving a mammogram within the last 2 years compared to women 50-74 (26.8%, 95% CI 24.9%-28.7%). None of the geographic factors were significant predictors of screening adherence. Based on covariate adjusted models, statistically significant (p<0.05) factors associated with increased odds of not receiving mammogram within the last 2 years included not having a regular physician, no health insurance, being aged 40-49, income less than $25,000, and the presence of three or more children in the home.
Conclusion: Mammography screening efforts in Utah should focus on improving access to insurance or a regular source of health care. Future research should also consider how best to address extreme time demands and competing priorities that present potential barriers for women with large families, resulting in lower screening levels among these women.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1361. Epub 2010 Apr 23. Rural Remote Health. 2010. PMID: 20438282 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Self-Reported Access to Health Care Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Nov;29(11):1437-1446. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8267. Epub 2020 May 5. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020. PMID: 32366199 Free PMC article.
-
Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening.Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):65-71.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Ann Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29439783 Free PMC article.
-
Geographic Access to Mammography and Its Relationship to Breast Cancer Screening and Stage at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.Womens Health Issues. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):482-93. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 26. Womens Health Issues. 2015. PMID: 26219677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography.Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(2):2730. Epub 2014 Jun 23. Rural Remote Health. 2014. PMID: 24953122 Review.
Cited by
-
Associations of social support, living arrangements, and residential stability with cancer screening in the United States.Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Oct 18. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01913-0. Online ahead of print. Cancer Causes Control. 2024. PMID: 39422870
-
The role of mesolevel characteristics of the health care system and socioeconomic factors on health care use - results of a scoping review.Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 23;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02122-6. Int J Equity Health. 2024. PMID: 38395914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Social determinants of health and health inequities in breast cancer screening: a scoping review.Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1354717. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354717. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38375339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: An Ecological Analysis of Australian Data.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Dec 1;24(12):4139-4145. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4139. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023. PMID: 38156849 Free PMC article.
-
Population-Level Access to Breast Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis in Nigeria.JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Sep;9:e2300093. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00093. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38096465 Free PMC article.
References
-
- U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United states cancer statistics: 1999–2009 Incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2013. Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs
-
- Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. United States preventive services task force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W112–W116 - PubMed
-
- Kim J, Jang SN. Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among U.S. women: Trends from 2000 to 2005. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41:186–194 - PubMed
-
- Rattanawatkul K, Carter-Pokras O. Decline and disparities in mammography use trends by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity. U Maryland McNair Scholars Undergrad Res J 2011;3:10
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
