Cost considerations in the treatment of anal fissures

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Aug;14(4):511-25. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.924398. Epub 2014 May 28.

Abstract

Anal fissure is a split in the lining of the distal anal canal. Lateral internal sphincterotomy remains the gold standard for treatment of anal fissure. Although technique is simple and effective, a drawback of this surgical procedure is its potential to cause minor but some times permanent alteration in rectal continence. Conservative approaches (such as topical application of ointment or botulinum toxin injections) have been proposed in order to treat this condition without any risk of permanent injury of the internal anal sphincter. These treatments are effective in a large number of patients. Furthermore, with the ready availability of medical therapies to induce healing of anal fissure, the risk of a first-line surgical approach is difficult to justify. The conservative treatments have a lower cost than surgery. Moreover, evaluation of the actual costs of each therapeutic option is important especially in times of economic crisis and downsizing of health spending.

Keywords: anus; autonomic nervous system disease; botulinum toxin; calcium channel blockers; cost analysis; evidence-based medicine; fissure-in-ano; lateral internal sphincterotomy; surgery.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anal Canal / physiopathology*
  • Anal Canal / surgery
  • Botulinum Toxins / administration & dosage
  • Botulinum Toxins / economics
  • Fecal Incontinence / epidemiology
  • Fecal Incontinence / etiology*
  • Fissure in Ano / economics
  • Fissure in Ano / physiopathology
  • Fissure in Ano / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control

Substances

  • Botulinum Toxins