Quantification of the impact of multifaceted initiatives intended to improve operational efficiency and the safety culture: a case study from an academic medical center radiation oncology department
- PMID: 24890355
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.05.007
Quantification of the impact of multifaceted initiatives intended to improve operational efficiency and the safety culture: a case study from an academic medical center radiation oncology department
Abstract
Purpose: We have systematically been incorporating several operational efficiency and safety initiatives into our academic radiation oncology clinic. We herein quantify the impact of these initiatives on prospectively collected, clinically meaningful, metrics.
Methods and materials: The data from 5 quality improvement initiatives, each focused on a specific safety/process concern in our clinic, are presented. Data was collected prospectively: operational metrics recorded before and after implementation of the initiative were compared using statistical analysis. Results from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient safety culture surveys administered during and after many of these initiatives were similarly compared.
Results: (1) Workload levels for nurses assisting with brachytherapy were high (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) scores >55-60, suggesting, "overwork"). Changes in work flow and procedure room layout reduced workload to more acceptable levels (NASA-TLX <55; P < .01). (2) The rate of treatment therapists being interrupted was reduced from a mean of 4 (range, 1-11) times per patient treatment to a mean <1 (range, 0-3; P < .001) after implementing standards for electronic communication and placement of monitors informing patients and staff of the treatment machine status (ie, delayed, on time). (3) The rates of replans by dosimetrists was reduced from 11% to 6% (P < .01) through a more systematic pretreatment peer review process. (4) Standardizing nursing and resident functions reduced patient wait times by ≈ 45% (14 min; P < .01). (5) Standardizing presimulation instructions from the physician reduced the number of patients experiencing delays on the simulator (>50% to <10%; P < .01). To assess the overall changes in "patient safety culture," we conducted a pre- and postanalysis using the AHRQ survey. Improvements in all measured dimensions were noted.
Conclusions: Quality improvement initiatives can be successfully implemented in an academic radiation oncology department to yield measurable improvements in operations resulting in improvement in patient safety culture.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Use of multiple methods to measure impact of a centralized call center on academic health system community pharmacies.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 21;76(6):353-359. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy068. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019. PMID: 31361842
-
Quantitative assessment of workload and stressors in clinical radiation oncology.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.063. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012. PMID: 22503527
-
Journey Toward High Reliability: A Comprehensive Safety Program to Improve Quality of Care and Safety Culture in a Large, Multisite Radiation Oncology Department.J Oncol Pract. 2016 May;12(5):e603-12. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008466. Epub 2016 Mar 29. J Oncol Pract. 2016. PMID: 27026647
-
Safety in radiation oncology: the role of international initiatives by the International Atomic Energy Agency.J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Nov;8(11):789-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.07.014. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011. PMID: 22051464 Review.
-
Quality indicators in radiation oncology.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):904-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.038. Epub 2012 Oct 3. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013. PMID: 23040217 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of interventions to improve safety culture on healthcare workers in hospital settings: a systematic review of the international literature.BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 7;13(2):e002506. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002506. BMJ Open Qual. 2024. PMID: 38719514 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Retrospective Versus Prospective Peer Review in a Multisite Academic Radiation Department.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Aug 9;9(2):101333. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101333. eCollection 2024 Feb. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38405306 Free PMC article.
-
The need for dedicated time for medical physicists practice quality improvement efforts in radiation oncology department: A commentary.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Mar;23(3):e13515. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13515. Epub 2022 Jan 18. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022. PMID: 35040244 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Restructuring Our Approach to Peer Review: A Critical Need to Improve the Quality and Safety of Radiation Therapy.Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep-Oct;10(5):321-323. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.07.001. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32888525 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Physicians' gender and their use of electronic health records: findings from a mixed-methods usability study.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1505-1514. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz126. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31504578 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
