Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;32(3):277-90, vii.
doi: 10.1016/j.det.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 May 5.

Photoimmunology

Affiliations
Review

Photoimmunology

Craig A Elmets et al. Dermatol Clin. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

The discipline that investigates the biologic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the immune system is called photoimmunology. Photoimmunology evolved from an interest in understanding the role of the immune system in skin cancer development and why immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients are at a greatly increased risk for cutaneous neoplasms. In addition to contributing to an understanding of the pathogenesis of nonmelanoma skin cancer, the knowledge acquired about the immunologic effects of ultraviolet radiation exposure has provided an understanding of its role in the pathogenesis of other photodermatologic diseases.

Keywords: Chronic actinic dermatitis; Cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Nonmelanoma skin cancer; Photoimmunology; Photosensitivity; Phototherapy; Polymorphous light eruption; Ultraviolet radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Conflicts of Interest:

Craig A. Elmets, M.D. None

Cather Cala None

Hui Xu, Ph.D. None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
UV-induced immune suppression and photocarcinogenesis. (A) Chronic exposure of mice, as in humans, results in the development of UV-induced non-melanoma skin cancers. (B) UV-induced tumors that are transplanted to genetically identical recipients that have not been exposed to UV radiation results in rejection of the tumor by the host immune response. (C) UV-induced tumors that are transplanted to genetically identical recipients that have received subcarcinogenic doses of UV radiation grow progressively and ultimately result in death of the recipient. (D) UV-induced tumors only develop when mutations in keratinocytes and UV-induced immunosuppression occurs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cell-mediated immune responses reflect the balance between regulatory and effector T-cells. (A) When antigens, including tumor antigens, are present in the skin, they are taken up by cutaneous dendritic cells, which is a necessary precondition for the generation of effector and regulatory Tlymphocytes. (B) When the skin has been UV-irradiated and then encounters an antigen, the generation of regulatory T-cells proceeds unimpeded, but the generation of effector T-cells is diminished. (C) The overall magnitude of the cutaneous cell-mediated immune response represents the balance between the effector and regulatory T-cells that are generated. Following UV exposure, there are relatively more regulatory T-cells, resulting in a more modest response.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on the antigen presenting function of cutaneous dendritic cells. Following UV exposure, the antigen presenting function of cutaneous dendritic cells is altered by direct effects on the antigen presenting cell itself and by indirect effects. The indirect effects are mediated by UV-irradiated keratinocyte production of soluble mediators such as IL-10, prostaglandin E2, and TNF-α, which then act on cutaneous dendritic cells. In addition, macrophages, which migrate into the skin following UV exposure, and regulatory T-cells both secrete the immunosuppressive molecule IL-10, which diminishes the capacity of cutaneous antigen presenting cells to activate effector T-cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mechanism of by which UV radiation suppresses cutaneous cell-mediated immune responses. Following UV exposure, DNA damage occurs, which, in addition to its other effects, initiates photoimmunosuppression. Furthermore, UV exposure of the skin results in the generation of soluble mediators including serotonin (5-HT), cis-urocanic acid (Cis-UCA) and platelet activating factor (PAF), all of which antagonize activation of DNA repair enzymes. In addition, UV exposure prompts keratinocytes to produce immunosuppressive mediators which alter the antigen presenting function of cutaneous dendritic cells. Regulatory T-cells are generated that produce IL-10, which suppresses host T-cell mediated defense mechanisms and facilitates the growth and development of UV-induced tumors. Solid line: stimulatory. Dashed line: inhibitory.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Proposed photopathogenesis of polymorphous light eruption (PMLE). In contrast to normal individuals who have a suppressed immune response following UV exposure, the immune response in patients with polymorphous light eruption is not suppressed.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Two proposed models of the photopathogenesis of cutaneous lupus. (A) In subjects with Ro positive lupus, UV exposure of the skin results in translocation of the Ro protein to the surface of the keratinocyte, which enables anti-Ro antibodies to bind. Cytotoxic cells that express Fc receptors for the IgG molecule bind to the Fc portion of the anti-Ro antibody, which is attached to UV-irradiated keratinocytes expressing the Ro antigen on their surface. Thus, cytotoxicity occurs, leading to keratinocyte lysis. (B) Following UV exposure, apoptotic keratinocytes (sunburn cells) result. Apoptotic blebs are released from the dying keratinocytes. In unaffected individuals, these apoptotic blebs are removed by macrophages via non-inflammatory mechanisms. In lupus patients, the apoptotic bodies are taken up by dendritic cells and enter a pro-inflammatory pathway.

Similar articles

  • The immunologic revolution: photoimmunology.
    Ullrich SE, Byrne SN. Ullrich SE, et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Mar;132(3 Pt 2):896-905. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.405. Epub 2011 Dec 15. J Invest Dermatol. 2012. PMID: 22170491 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Reflections on the field of photoimmunology.
    Kripke ML. Kripke ML. J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Jan;133(1):27-30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.234. Epub 2012 Aug 2. J Invest Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 22854621 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Photoimmunology.
    Morison WL, Parrish JA, Epstein JH. Morison WL, et al. Arch Dermatol. 1979 Mar;115(3):350-5. Arch Dermatol. 1979. PMID: 373637 Review. No abstract available.
  • Milestones in photoimmunology.
    Schwarz T, Beissert S. Schwarz T, et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Jul 1;133(E1):E7-E10. doi: 10.1038/skinbio.2013.177. J Invest Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23820723 Review. No abstract available.
  • Ultraviolet immunosuppression: mechanisms and consequences.
    Hanneman KK, Cooper KD, Baron ED. Hanneman KK, et al. Dermatol Clin. 2006 Jan;24(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2005.08.003. Dermatol Clin. 2006. PMID: 16311164 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Marks R, Rennie G, Selwood TS. Spontaneous remission of solar keratoses: the case for conservative management. Br J Dermatol. 1986;115:649–655. - PubMed
    1. Hartevelt MM, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Kootte AM, et al. Incidence of skin cancer after renal transplantation in the Netherlands. Transplantation. 1990;49:506–509. - PubMed
    1. Bouwes-Bavinck JN, Vermeer BJ, van-der-Woude FJ, et al. Relation between skin cancer and HLA antigens in renal-transplant patients. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:843–848. - PubMed
    1. Webb MC, Compton F, Andrews PA, et al. Skin tumours posttransplantation: a retrospective analysis of 28 years’ experience at a single centre. Transplant Proc. 1997;29:828–830. - PubMed
    1. Jensen P, Moller B, Hansen S. Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42:307. - PubMed

Publication types