Temporal control in Pavlovian occasion setting
- PMID: 24896976
- DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00051-5
Temporal control in Pavlovian occasion setting
Abstract
Rats were trained with two Pavlovian serial feature positive discriminations (X→A+/A- and Y→B+, B-), in which the target stimuli (A and B) were reinforced when they were preceded by the feature stimuli (X and Y), but not when they were presented alone. In one discrimination the feature-target interval was 10 s, and in the other discrimination that interval was 30 s. In a series of tests in which the feature target interval varied in ten steps between 5 and 50 s, performance was better when the targets were presented at their usual training times after the feature, rather than earlier or later. Training with the shorter FTI (10 s) resulted in both greater peak responding at the training interval and steeper temporal gradients than training with the longer FTI (30 s). Presentation of a compound feature comprised of both the 10 s and 30 s feature elements shifted the time of peak target responding to an intermediate value, 15 s. In contrast, simple conditioning controlled by the features (measured in the empty intervals between feature and target presentations) showed temporal control but no evidence for stimulus averaging. Most of these results are consistent with scalar timing, but may imply separate temporal codes or timing mechanisms for simple conditioning and occasion setting.
Similar articles
-
Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.Behav Processes. 2008 Nov;79(3):132-47. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 10. Behav Processes. 2008. PMID: 18657599
-
Temporal specificity in serial feature-positive discrimination learning.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Jan;23(1):95-109. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.1.95. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997. PMID: 9008864
-
The effects of feature extinction in dual-response feature-positive discriminations.J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2023 Oct;49(4):273-288. doi: 10.1037/xan0000360. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2023. PMID: 37883031
-
Reinstatement after human feature-positive discrimination learning.Behav Processes. 2017 Apr;137:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 28108345 Review.
-
The influence of landmark stability on control by occasion setters.Behav Processes. 2017 Apr;137:84-97. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 28088553 Review.
Cited by
-
Special issue on computational models of classical conditioning guest editors' introduction.Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):231-40. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0081-7. Learn Behav. 2012. PMID: 22926998
-
Examining the influence of CS duration and US density on cue-potentiated feeding through analyses of licking microstructure.Learn Motiv. 2018 Feb;61:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2017.07.001. Learn Motiv. 2018. PMID: 30082927 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of cardiac responses to serial stimuli after Pavlovian conditioning in rats.Anim Learn Behav. 2002 May;30(2):132-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03192915. Anim Learn Behav. 2002. PMID: 12141134
-
Stimulus compounding in interval timing: the modality-duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):94-107. doi: 10.1037/a0020200. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011. PMID: 20718546 Free PMC article.
-
The Winding Road to Relapse: Forging a New Understanding of Cue-Induced Reinstatement Models and Their Associated Neural Mechanisms.Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb 9;12:17. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00017. eCollection 2018. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29479311 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
