Whatever happened to the 'mad, bad' scientist? Overturning the stereotype

Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):31-44. doi: 10.1177/0963662514535689. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

Abstract

The cluster of myths relating to the pursuit of knowledge has perpetuated the archetype of the alchemist/scientist as sinister, dangerous, possibly mad and threatening to society's values. Shelley's Frankenstein provided imagery and a vocabulary universally invoked in relation to scientific discoveries and technological innovation. The reasons for the longevity of this seemingly antiquated, semiotic imagery are discussed. In the twenty-first century, this stereotype has been radically revised, even overturned. Scientists are now rarely objects of fear or mockery. Mathematicians, both real-life and fictional, are discussed here as being representative of scientists now depicted empathically. This article examines possible sociological reasons for this reversal; what the revisionist image suggests about society's changed attitudes to science; and what might be the substitute fears and sources of horror.

Keywords: Frankenstein; alchemist; communication; environment; evil scientists; mathematicians in fiction; myth; semiotic characters; ‘mad scientist’.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Empathy
  • Fear
  • History, 20th Century
  • History, 21st Century
  • Humans
  • Laboratory Personnel
  • Motion Pictures / history*
  • Motion Pictures / trends
  • Science*
  • Stereotyping*