Abstract
The RNA chaperone Hfq acts as a central player in post-transcriptional gene regulation in several Gram-negative Bacteria, whereas comparatively little is known about its role in Gram-positive Bacteria. Here, we studied the function of Hfq in Bacillus subtilis, and show that it confers a survival advantage. A comparative transcriptome analysis revealed mRNAs with a differential abundance that are governed by the ResD-ResE system required for aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Expression of resD was found to be up-regulated in the hfq- strain. Furthermore, several genes of the GerE and ComK regulons were de-regulated in the hfq- background. Surprisingly, only six out of >100 known and predicted small RNAs (sRNAs) showed altered abundance in the absence of Hfq. Moreover, Hfq positively affected the transcript abundance of genes encoding type I toxin-antitoxin systems. Taken the moderate effect on sRNA levels and mRNAs together, it seems rather unlikely that Hfq plays a central role in RNA transactions in Bacillus subtilis.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Aerobiosis
-
Bacillus subtilis / genetics
-
Bacillus subtilis / growth & development*
-
Bacillus subtilis / metabolism
-
Bacterial Proteins / genetics
-
Bacterial Proteins / metabolism*
-
DNA-Binding Proteins / genetics
-
Gene Expression Profiling / methods*
-
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial*
-
Host Factor 1 Protein / genetics
-
Host Factor 1 Protein / metabolism*
-
RNA, Bacterial / analysis*
-
RNA, Messenger / analysis
-
RNA, Small Nuclear / analysis
-
Regulon
-
Stress, Physiological
-
Transcription Factors / genetics
Substances
-
Bacterial Proteins
-
DNA-Binding Proteins
-
Host Factor 1 Protein
-
RNA, Bacterial
-
RNA, Messenger
-
RNA, Small Nuclear
-
ResD protein, Bacillus subtilis
-
Transcription Factors
Grants and funding
The work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (
www.fwf.ac.at/en) through the Special Research Program RNA-REG F43, subproject AF4311 (UB), and the doctoral program RNA-Biology W-1207 (HH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.