Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: impact on perioperative complications and predictors from national data
- PMID: 24936721
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.029
Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: impact on perioperative complications and predictors from national data
Abstract
Purpose: Despite the increased use of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy, open conversion may occur due to surgical complications, surgeon inexperience or failure to progress. We used nationally representative data to quantify the impact of open conversion compared to nonconverted minimally invasive radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy, and identify predictors of open conversion.
Materials and methods: Years 2004 to 2010 of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were queried for patients who underwent radical prostatectomy to analyze the association of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy with Clavien complications. Multivariate regression models yielded significant predictors of open conversion.
Results: From 2004 to 2010, 134,398 (95% CI 111,509-157,287) minimally invasive radical prostatectomies were performed with a 1.8% (95% CI 1.4-2.1) open conversion rate, translating to 2,360 (95% CI 2,001-2,720) conversions. Open conversion cases had a longer length of stay (4.17 vs 1.71 days, p <0.001) and higher hospital charges ($51,049 vs $37,418, p <0.001) than nonconverted cases. Of open conversion cases 45.2% experienced a complication vs 7.2% and 12.9% of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy cases, respectively (p <0.001). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, open conversion was associated with significantly increased odds of a Clavien grade 1, 2, 3 and 4 complication compared to nonconverted minimally invasive radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy (OR range 2.913 to 15.670, p <0.001). Significant multivariate predictors of open conversion were obesity (OR 1.916), adhesions (OR 3.060), anemia (OR 5.692) and surgeon volume for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy less than 25 cases per year (OR 7.376) (all p <0.01).
Conclusions: Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy is associated with a higher than expected increase in complications compared to open radical prostatectomy and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy after adjusting for age and comorbidities. External validation of predictors of open conversion may prove useful in minimizing open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Keywords: complications; conversion to open surgery; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; robotics.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Population based analysis of incidence and predictors of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):826-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.113. Epub 2015 Jan 26. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25632850
-
Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.054. Epub 2008 Sep 17. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18801512
-
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22206800
-
Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia.BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107 Suppl 3:11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10053.x. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 21492370 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages?J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 10;23(32):8170-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1963. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16278469 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic prostatectomy after abandoned open radical prostatectomy-Technical aspects and outcomes.BJUI Compass. 2020 Aug 30;1(5):174-179. doi: 10.1002/bco2.34. eCollection 2020 Nov. BJUI Compass. 2020. PMID: 35475212 Free PMC article.
-
Changing trends in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Inverse stage migration-A retrospective analysis.Prostate Int. 2021 Sep;9(3):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 28. Prostate Int. 2021. PMID: 34692589 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Postprostatectomy Incontinence Requiring Anti-incontinence Surgery After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis.Int Neurourol J. 2021 Sep;25(3):263-270. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040296.148. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Int Neurourol J. 2021. PMID: 33705635 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment outcomes of bladder neck contractures from surgical clip erosion: a matched cohort comparison.Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Feb;9(1):115-120. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.01. Transl Androl Urol. 2020. PMID: 32055475 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
