Effect of closure of the mesenteric defect during laparoscopic gastric bypass and prevention of internal hernia

Dan Med J. 2014 Jun;61(6):A4854.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of closing the mesenteric defects during gastric bypass to avoid internal herniation (IH).

Material and methods: The study is performed as a single-centre, randomised, controlled, blinded trial. Patients are randomly assigned to either conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) without closing the mesenteric defects (n = 250) or RYGB with closing of the defects with hernia clips (n = 250). Follow-up is conducted at six months, one year, two years and five years after RYGB. The primary endpoint is the incidence of IH.

Conclusion: This study will be the first Danish, randomised, controlled study comparing conventional LRYGB with and without closure of the mesenteric defects. The results will contribute to evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of IH.

Funding: not relevant.

Trial registration: The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (SN-10-2012) and The Central Denmark Regional Committees on Biomedical Research Ethics (1-01-83-0209-12, SJ-284). The study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01595230.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Abscess / etiology
  • Anastomotic Leak / etiology
  • Gastric Bypass / adverse effects
  • Gastric Bypass / methods*
  • Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Hernia / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Ileus / etiology
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Mesentery / surgery*
  • Operative Time
  • Pain, Postoperative / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Research Design*
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Surgical Instruments / statistics & numerical data
  • Wound Closure Techniques / adverse effects

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01595230