Employee knowledge of value-based insurance design benefits
- PMID: 24951038
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.005
Employee knowledge of value-based insurance design benefits
Abstract
Background: Value-based insurance designs (VBD) incorporate evidence-based medicine into health benefit design. Consumer knowledge of new VBD benefits is important to assessing their impact on health care use.
Purpose: To assess knowledge of features of a VBD.
Methods: The eligible study population was employees receiving healthcare benefits in an integrated care system in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. In 2010, participants completed a web-based survey 2 months after rollout of the plan, including three true/false questions about benefit design features including copays for preventive care visits and chronic disease medications and premium costs. Analysis was completed in 2012. Knowledgeable was defined as correct response to all three questions; self-reported knowledge was also assessed.
Results: A total of 3,463 people completed the survey (response rate=71.7%). The majority of respondents were female (80.1%) Caucasians (79.6%) aged 35-64 years (79.0%), reflecting the overall employee population. A total of 45.7% had at least a 4-year college education, and 69.1% were married. About three quarters of respondents correctly answered each individual question; half (52.1%) of respondents answered all three questions correctly. On multivariate analysis, knowledge was independently associated with female gender (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.40, 2.31); Caucasian race (OR=1.72, 95% CI=1.28, 2.32); increasing household income (OR for ≥$100,000=1.86, 95% CI=1.29, 2.68); nonunion job status (OR compared to union status=1.63, 95% CI=1.17, 2.26); and high satisfaction with the health plan (OR compared to low satisfaction=1.26; 95% CI=1.00, 1.57).
Conclusions: Incomplete knowledge of benefits is prevalent in an employee population soon after VBD rollout.
Copyright © 2014 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Early experience with employee choice of consumer-directed health plans and satisfaction with enrollment.Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1141-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00279.x. Health Serv Res. 2004. PMID: 15230917 Free PMC article.
-
Employee responses to health insurance premium increases.Am J Manag Care. 2004 Jan;10(1):41-7. Am J Manag Care. 2004. PMID: 14738186
-
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x. Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16987300 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge of cost sharing and decisions to seek care.Am J Manag Care. 2010 Apr;16(4):298-304. Am J Manag Care. 2010. PMID: 20394467
-
Health insurance portability: COBRA expansions and job mobility.EBRI Issue Brief. 1998 Feb;(194):1-18. EBRI Issue Brief. 1998. PMID: 10177291
Cited by
-
Does the diabetes health plan have a differential impact on medication adherence among beneficiaries with fewer financial resources?J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):948-957. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.948. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022. PMID: 36001105 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Worker Productivity Using Self-Report, Electronic Health Record and Human Resource Data.J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Nov;60(11):e569-e574. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001441. J Occup Environ Med. 2018. PMID: 30188491 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
