Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 23;106(8):dju157.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju157. Print 2014 Aug.

Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography

Affiliations

Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography

Kenyon C Bolton et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Screening mammography utilization in Vermont has declined since 2009 during a time of changing screening guidelines and increased interest in personalized screening regimens. This study evaluates whether the breast cancer risk distribution of the state's screened population changed during the observed decline.

Methods: We examined the breast cancer risk distribution among screened women between 2001 and 2012 using data from the Vermont Breast Cancer Surveillance System. We estimated each screened woman's 5-year risk of breast cancer using the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk calculator. Annual screening counts by risk group were normalized and age-adjusted to the Vermont female population by direct standardization.

Results: The normalized rate of low-risk (5-year breast cancer risk of <1%) women screened increased 8.3% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.8 to 11.9) between 2003 and 2008 and then declined by -5.4% per year (95% CI = -8.1 to -2.6) until 2012. When stratified by age group, the rate of low-risk women screened declined -4.4% per year (95% CI = -8.8 to 0.1; not statistically significant) for ages 40 to 49 years and declined a statistically significant -7.1% per year (95% CI = -12.1 to -2.0) for ages 50 to 74 years during 2008 to 2012. These declines represented the bulk of overall decreases in screening after 2008, with rates for women categorized in higher risk levels generally exhibiting small annual changes.

Conclusions: The observed decline in women screened in Vermont in recent years is largely attributable to reductions in screening visits by women who are at low risk of developing breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Normalized rates of screened women in each 5-year Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk category, 2001 to 2012. A) Ages 40 to 74 years. B) Ages 40 to 49 years. C) Ages 50 to 74 years. To find the normalized rate, the annual age-specific counts of screened women in each risk group were divided by the age-specific Vermont female population in that year, and the resultant rates were combined within risk groups by age-adjustment to the 2001 to 2012 Vermont female population. Five-year BCSC risk score categories: low (<1%), average (1%–1.66%), intermediate (1.67%–2.49%), high (2.5%–3.99%), and very high (≥4%).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):727–W242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmot MG. Sorting through the arguments on breast screening. JAMA. 2013;309(24):2553–2554. - PubMed
    1. Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA. 2009;302(15):1685–1692. - PubMed
    1. Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, et al. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(11):2205–2240. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1998–2005. - PubMed