Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians
- PMID: 24979449
- DOI: 10.7326/M13-2881
Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians
Abstract
Background: Pelvic examination is often included in well-woman visits even when cervical cancer screening is not required.
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, benefits, and harms of pelvic examination in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, average-risk adult women. Cervical cancer screening was not included.
Data sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through January 2014 and reference lists from identified studies.
Study selection: 52 English-language studies, 32 of which included primary data.
Data extraction: Data were extracted on study and sample characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Quality of the diagnostic accuracy studies was evaluated using a published instrument, and quality of the survey studies was evaluated with metrics assessing population representativeness, instrument development, and response rates.
Data synthesis: The positive predictive value of pelvic examination for detecting ovarian cancer was less than 4% in the 2 studies that reported this metric. No studies that investigated the morbidity or mortality benefits of screening pelvic examination for any condition were identified. The percentage of women reporting pelvic examination-related pain or discomfort ranged from 11% to 60% (median, 35%; 8 studies [n = 4576]). Corresponding figures for fear, embarrassment, or anxiety ranged from 10% to 80% (median, 34%; 7 studies [n = 10 702]).
Limitation: Only English-language publications were included; the evidence on diagnostic accuracy, morbidity, and mortality was scant; and the studies reporting harms were generally low quality.
Conclusion: No data supporting the use of pelvic examination in asymptomatic, average-risk women were found. Low-quality data suggest that pelvic examinations may cause pain, discomfort, fear, anxiety, or embarrassment in about 30% of women.
Primary funding source: Department of Veterans Affairs.
Comment in
-
Evidence is lacking to support pelvic examinations as a screening tool for non-cervical cancers or other conditions.Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;20(1):31. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110081. Epub 2014 Sep 26. Evid Based Med. 2015. PMID: 25260357 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 16;161(12):924. doi: 10.7326/L14-5034. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25506862 No abstract available.
-
Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 16;161(12):924-5. doi: 10.7326/L14-5034-2. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25506863 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening pelvic examination in nonpregnant adult women: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):I-24. doi: 10.7326/P14-9021. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24979461 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Periodic Screening Pelvic Examination: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):954-966. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12819. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28267861 Review.
-
No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Aug;41(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.007. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019. PMID: 31331610
-
Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):67-72. doi: 10.7326/M14-0701. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24979451 Review.
-
Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Jan;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2349. Epub 2010 Dec 31. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011. PMID: 21194307
-
Screening for Gynecologic Conditions With Pelvic Examination: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Mar. Report No.: 15-05220-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Mar. Report No.: 15-05220-EF-1. PMID: 28727393 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Neglected Intrauterine Device Migration Complications: Case Reports.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Jan 18;4(1):11-18. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0099. eCollection 2023. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023. PMID: 36727094 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship Between Sexual Assault History and Cervical Cancer Screening Completion Among Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul;31(7):1040-1047. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0237. Epub 2022 Jan 18. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022. PMID: 35049381 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):274-280. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5727. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31904768 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers for distinguishing malignant and benign ovarian masses.J Cancer. 2018 Mar 8;9(7):1165-1172. doi: 10.7150/jca.23606. eCollection 2018. J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29675097 Free PMC article.
-
Ending Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Risk Women After Age 65: Understanding Barriers to Adherence With Evidence-Based Guidelines Among Primary Care Providers.Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 16;5:2333392818755241. doi: 10.1177/2333392818755241. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29568789 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources