Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:180495.
doi: 10.1155/2014/180495. Epub 2014 May 27.

Amelioration of Diabetes and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy by Punica granatum L. Extract and Its Spray Dried Biopolymeric Dispersions

Affiliations

Amelioration of Diabetes and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy by Punica granatum L. Extract and Its Spray Dried Biopolymeric Dispersions

K Raafat et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014.

Abstract

Aims. To evaluate the effect of Punica granatum (Pg) rind extract and its spray dried biopolymeric dispersions with casein (F1) or chitosan (F2) against Diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic neuropathy (DN). Methods. We measured the acute (6 h) and subacute (8 days) effect of various doses of Pg, F1, and F2 and the active compounds on alloxan-induced DM mouse model. We evaluated DN utilizing latency tests for longer period of time (8 weeks). In addition, the in vivo antioxidant activity was assessed utilizing serum catalase level. Results. The results proved that the highest dose levels of Pg extract, F1, F2 exerted remarkable hypoglycemic activity with 48, 52, and 40% drop in the mice glucose levels after 6 hours, respectively. The tested compounds also improved peripheral nerve function as observed from the latency tests. Bioguided fractionation suggested that gallic acid (GA) was Pg main active ingredient responsible for its actions. Conclusion. Pg extract, F1, F2, and GA could be considered as a new therapeutic potential for the amelioration of diabetic neuropathic pain and the observed in vivo antioxidant potential may be involved in its antinociceptive effect. It is highly significant to pay attention to Pg and GA for amelioration and control of DM and its complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
In vitro release pattern of P. granatum L. extract from different biopolymeric dispersions of casein (F1) and chitosan (F2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of P. granatum ethanolic extract (Pg) and tramadol (TRA) 10 mg/kg, as positive control, on the hot plate and tail withdrawal latencies in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. (a) Hot plate latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line); DIA + Pg 25 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with Pg 25 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + Pg 50 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with Pg 50 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line); DIA + Pg 100 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with Pg 100 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). (b) Tail withdrawal latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line); DIA + Pg 25 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with Pg 25 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + Pg 50 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with Pg 50 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line); DIA + Pg 100 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with Pg 100 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. “∗” means P < 0.05 compared with vehicle. “∗∗” means P < 0.01 compared with vehicle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of F1 and TRA 10 mg/kg, as positive control, on the hot plate and tail withdrawal latencies in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. (a) Hot plate latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); placebo F1: diabetic animals treated with placebo F1 200 mg/kg (crossed-squares, dashed-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line); DIA + F1 50 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F1 50 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + F1 100 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F1 100 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line); DIA + F1 200 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with Pg F1 200 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). (b) Tail withdrawal latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); placebo F1: diabetic animals treated with placebo F1 200 mg/kg (crossed-squares, dashed-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line); DIA + F1 50 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F1 50 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + F1 100 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F1 100 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line); DIA + F1 200 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F1 200 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. “∗” means P < 0.05 compared with vehicle. “∗∗” means P < 0.01 compared with vehicle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of F2 and TRA 10 mg/kg, as positive control, on the hot plate and tail withdrawal latencies in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. (a) Hot plate latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); placebo F2: diabetic animals treated with placebo F2 200 mg/kg (crossed-squares, dashed-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line); DIA + F2 50 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F2 50 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + F2 100 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F2 100 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line). DIA + Pg 200 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F2 200 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). (b) Tail withdrawal latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); placebo F2: diabetic animals treated with placebo F2 200 mg/kg (crossed-squares, dashed-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line). DIA + F2 50 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F2 50 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + F2 100 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F2 100 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line). DIA + F2 200 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with F2 200 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. “∗” means P < 0.05 compared with vehicle. “∗∗” means P < 0.01 compared with vehicle.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of gallic acid (GA) and tramadol (TRA) 10 mg/kg, as positive control, on the hot plate and tail withdrawal latencies in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. (a) Hot plate latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line); DIA + GA 3 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with GA 3 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + GA 6 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with GA 6 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line). DIA + Pg 12 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with GA 12 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). (b) Tail withdrawal latency: NORM: normal control mice (crossed-triangles, straight line); DIA + VEH: diabetic animals treated with vehicle as control (closed-squares, straight-line); positive control TRA 10 mg/kg: alloxan treated mice with TRA 10 mg/kg (solid-stars, dotted-line); DIA + GA 3 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with GA 3 mg/kg (solid-circles, straight-line); DIA + GA 6 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with GA 6 mg/kg (up-triangles, dashed-line); DIA + GA 12 mg/kg: diabetic animals treated with GA 12 mg/kg (right-triangles, dashed-dotted-line). Data are expressed in mean ± SEM. “∗” means P < 0.05 compared with vehicle. “∗∗” means P < 0.01 compared with vehicle.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(9):1414–1431. - PubMed
    1. Stopford R, Winkley K, Ismail K. Social support and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies. Patient Education and Counseling. 2013;93(3):549–558. - PubMed
    1. Raafat K, Boukhary R, Aboul-Ela M, El-Lakany A. Endogenous Lebanese plants treating diabetes and related complications. Natural Products Chemistry and Research. 1(3):112–120.
    1. Bakirel T, Bakirel U, Keleş OÜ, Ülgen SG, Yardibi H. In vivo assessment of antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) in alloxan-diabetic rabbits. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2008;116(1):64–73. - PubMed
    1. Baliga MS, Shivashankara AR, Shetty CB, Thilakchand KR, Periera N, Palatty PL. Antidiabetic effects of Punica granatum L, (Pomegranate): a review. In: Watson RR, Preed VR, editors. Bioactive Food as Dietary Interventions for Diabetes. Academic Press; 2013. pp. 355–369.

LinkOut - more resources