A comparative assessment of small-head metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacement
- PMID: 24986938
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32369
A comparative assessment of small-head metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacement
Abstract
Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR) have given rise to concern. Comparative studies of small-head MoM THRs over a longer follow-up period are lacking. Our objective was to compare the incidence of complications such as infection, dislocation, revision, adverse local tissue reactions, mortality and radiological and clinical outcomes in small-head (28 mm) MoM and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) THRs up to 12 years post-operatively. A prospective cohort study included 3341 THRs in 2714 patients. The mean age was 69.1 years (range 24 to 98) and 1848 (55.3%) were performed in women, with a mean follow-up of 115 months (18 to 201). There were 883 MoM and 2458 CoP bearings. Crude incidence rates (cases/1000 person-years) were: infection 1.3 vs 0.8; dislocation 3.3 vs 3.1 and all-cause revision 4.3 vs 2.2, respectively. There was a significantly higher revision rate after ten years (adjusted hazard ratio 9.4; 95% CI 2.6 to 33.6) in the MoM group, and ten of 26 patients presented with an adverse local tissue reaction at revision. No differences in mortality, osteolysis or clinical outcome were seen. In conclusion, we found similar results for small-head MoM and CoP bearings up to ten years post-operatively, but after ten years MoM THRs had a higher risk of all-cause revision. Furthermore, the presence of an adverse response to metal debris seen in the small-head MOM group at revision is a cause for concern.
Keywords: 28 mm head; Adverse local tissure reaction; Infection; Metal-on-metal; Osteolysis; Revision; Total hip replacement.
©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
Comment in
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. Epub 2016 May 26. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27228230 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Dec 13;17(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1329-8. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016. PMID: 27955657 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012. PMID: 23032586
-
Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2213-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4916-y. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 27249955 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3):B5350. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28260601 Review.
-
Metal on Metal or Ceramic on Ceramic for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2637-2645.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 27. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 27215192 Review.
Cited by
-
Head, acetabular liner composition, and rate of revision and wear in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47670-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37989863 Free PMC article.
-
The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacements.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Oct 16;18(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1773-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 29037237 Free PMC article.
-
Pseudotumours, cobalt and clinical outcome in small head metal-on-metal versus conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.Hip Int. 2020 Jan;30(1):56-63. doi: 10.1177/1120700019832877. Epub 2019 Mar 6. Hip Int. 2020. PMID: 30838896 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. Epub 2016 May 26. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27228230 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Neglected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Orthop Surg. 2019 Jun;11(3):348-355. doi: 10.1111/os.12472. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Orthop Surg. 2019. PMID: 31197911 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
