Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;7(2):86-91.
doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.132474.

Prevalence of congenital anomalies in newborns with congenital heart disease diagnosis

Alexander Egbe  1 , Simon Lee  1 , Deborah Ho  2 , Santosh Uppu  1 , Shubhika Srivastava  1
Affiliations

Prevalence of congenital anomalies in newborns with congenital heart disease diagnosis

Alexander Egbe et al. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 May.

Abstract

Background: There is a known association between congenital heart disease (CHD) and other congenital anomalies (CA). These associations have been altered by changes in prenatal factors in recent time. We reviewed the largest database of inpatient hospitalization information and analyzed the current association between common CHD diagnoses and other congenital anomalies.

Materials and methods: Case-control study design. We reviewed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 1998 to 2008 and identified all live births with CHD diagnosis (case) and live births without CHD diagnosis (control). We compared prevalence of associated congenital anomalies between the case and control groups.

Results: Our cohort consisted of 97,154 and 12,078,482 subjects in the case and control groups, respectively. In the CHD population, prevalence of non-syndromic congenital anomaly (NSCA), genetic syndrome (GS), and overall extra-cardiac congenital anomaly (CA) were 11.4, 2.2, and 13.6%, respectively. In the control group, prevalence of NSCA, GS, and CA were 6.7, 0.3, and 7.0%, respectively. NSCA (odds ratio (OR): 1.88, confidence interval (CI): 1.73-1.94), GS (OR 2.52, CI 2.44-2.61), and overall CA (OR: 2.01, CI: 1.97-2.14) were strongly associated with CHD. Prevalence of GS and multiple organ-system CA decreased significantly over the study period.

Conclusions: This is the largest and most comprehensive population-based study evaluating association between CHD and extra-cardiac malformation (ECM) in newborns. There was significant decrease in prevalence of GS and multiple CA over the study period.

Keywords: Congenital anomalies; epidemiology; extra cardiac; newborn; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of congenital anomalies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time trend analysis of congenital anomalies prevalence
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lee K, Khoshnood B, Chen L, Wall SN, Cromie WJ, Mittendorf RL. Infant mortality from congenital malformations in the United States, 1970-1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:620–7. - PubMed
    1. Tennstedt C, Chaoui R, Korner H, Dietel M. Spectrum of congenital heart defects and extracardiac malformations associated with chromosomal abnormalities: Results of a seven year necropsy study. Heart. 1999;82:34–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffman JI, Christianson R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 1978;42:641–7. - PubMed
    1. Ferencz C, Rubin JD, McCarter RJ, Boughman JA, Wilson PD, Brenner JI, et al. Cardiac and noncardiac malformations: Observations in a population-based study. Teratology. 1987;35:367–78. - PubMed
    1. Greenwood RD. Cardiovascular malformations associated with extracardiac anomalies and malformation syndromes. Patterns for diagnosis. Clin Pediatr. 1984;23:145–51. - PubMed