Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;70(6):969-80.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu079. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

Bargaining Power, Parental Caregiving, and Intergenerational Coresidence

Affiliations

Bargaining Power, Parental Caregiving, and Intergenerational Coresidence

Liliana E Pezzin et al. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of changes in parent-child coresidence on caregiving decisions of non-resident siblings over a 5-year period while controlling for characteristics of the elderly parent and adult children in the family network.

Method: We use difference-in-difference models applied to Health and Retirement Study-Assets and Health Dynamics of the Elderly data to test the hypothesis that the formation of a joint household between a parent and one of her children raises the bargaining power of non-resident siblings, who then reduce their care to the parent. Similarly, the dissolution of a parent-child household is expected to increase the bargaining power of the child who no longer coresides with the parent relative to her siblings.

Results: We find that children whose parent and sibling begin coresiding during the study period are less likely to provide care and provide fewer hours of care than children whose parents never coresided with a child. Adult children whose parent cease coresiding with a sibling, on the other hand, have a higher likelihood of providing care and provide significantly more hours of care relative to children whose parents either coresided with a sibling in both time periods or never coresided with a child.

Discussion: Meeting the needs of the growing elderly population while maintaining them in the community is a particular focus of long-term care policy. To the extent that shared living is an important component of such care, the observed sensitivity of non-resident children's caregiving efforts has implications for the well-being of both disabled parents and their coresiding adult children.

Keywords: Aging; Caregiving; Family bargaining; Intergenerational coresidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abel A., Bernheim D. B. (1991). Fiscal policy with impure intergenerational altruism. Econometrica, 59, 1687–1711.
    1. Alderman H., Chiappori P.-A., Haddad L., Hoddinott J., Kanbur R. (1995). Unitary versus collective models of the household: Is it time to shift the burden of proof? World Bank Research Observer, 10, 1–19.
    1. Altonji J., Hayashi F., Kotlikoff L. (1992). Is the extended family altruistically linked? Direct tests using micro data. American Economic Review, 82, 1177–1198.
    1. Altonji J., Hayashi F., Kotlikoff L. (1997). Parental altruism and inter vivos transfers: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 1121–1166.
    1. Antonucci T. C. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In Binstock R. H., George K. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 205–226). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.

Publication types