Emergent care patterns in patients with spina bifida: a case-control study
- PMID: 25016137
- PMCID: PMC4379115
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.085
Emergent care patterns in patients with spina bifida: a case-control study
Abstract
Purpose: Individuals with spina bifida are typically followed closely as outpatients by multidisciplinary teams. However, emergent care of these patients is not well defined. We describe patterns of emergent care in patients with spina bifida and healthy controls.
Materials and methods: We reviewed Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data from 2006 to 2010. Subjects without spina bifida (controls) were selected from the sample using stratified random sampling and matched to each case by age, gender and treatment year at a 1:4 ratio. Missing emergency department charges were estimated by multiple imputation. Statistical analyses were performed to compare patterns of care among emergency department visits and charges.
Results: A total of 226,709 patients with spina bifida and 888,774 controls were identified. Mean age was 28.2 years, with 34.6% of patients being younger than 21. Patients with spina bifida were more likely than controls to have public insurance (63.7% vs 35.4%, p <0.001) and to be admitted to the hospital from the emergency department (37.0% vs 9.2%, p <0.001). Urinary tract infections were the single most common acute diagnosis in patients with spina bifida seen emergently (OR 8.7, p <0.001), followed by neurological issues (OR 2.0, p <0.001). Urological issues were responsible for 34% of total emergency department charges. Mean charges per encounter were significantly higher in spina bifida cases vs controls ($2,102 vs $1,650, p <0.001), as were overall charges for patients subsequently admitted from emergent care ($36,356 vs $29,498, p <0.001).
Conclusions: Compared to controls, patients with spina bifida presenting emergently are more likely to have urological or neurosurgical problems, to undergo urological or neurosurgical procedures, to be admitted from the emergency department and to incur higher associated charges.
Keywords: case-control studies; emergency treatment; spinal bifida cystica.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Emergency department utilization among pediatric spina bifida patients.J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2019;12(4):375-381. doi: 10.3233/PRM-180561. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2019. PMID: 31744029 Free PMC article.
-
Complications of surgical management of upper tract calculi in spina bifida patients: analysis of nationwide data.J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.095. Epub 2014 Sep 28. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25261805 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital and ED charges for spina bifida care in the United States between 2006 and 2014: Over $2 billion annually.Disabil Health J. 2019 Jul;12(3):431-436. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 21. Disabil Health J. 2019. PMID: 30711573 Free PMC article.
-
Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood.J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.107. Epub 2015 Apr 1. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25839383 Review.
-
Care coordination guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida.J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2020;13(4):499-511. doi: 10.3233/PRM-200738. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2020. PMID: 33285645 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Parents' report on the health care management of spina bifida in early childhood.J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2022;15(4):621-631. doi: 10.3233/PRM-220027. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2022. PMID: 36530103 Free PMC article.
-
Scope of care in the first four years of life for individuals born with myelomeningocele: A single institution experience1.J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2021;14(4):667-673. doi: 10.3233/PRM-200803. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 34864701 Free PMC article.
-
Site, frequency, and duration of pain in young children with spina bifida.J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2021;14(4):571-582. doi: 10.3233/PRM-190661. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 34776433 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Health Literacy and Self-reported Readiness for Transition to Adult Care Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Spina Bifida.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127034. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27034. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34581795 Free PMC article.
-
Orthopedic management of myelomeningocele with a multidisciplinary approach: a systematic review of the literature.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 13;16(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02643-8. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34389028 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ, et al. Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 2001;285:2981. - PubMed
-
- Mathews TJ, Honein MA, Erickson JD. Spina bifida and anencephaly prevalence–United States, 1991-2001. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51:9. - PubMed
-
- Davis BE, Daley CM, Shurtleff DB, et al. Long-term survival of individuals with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2005;41:186. - PubMed
-
- Young NL, Steele C, Fehlings D, et al. Use of health care among adults with chronic and complex physical disabilities of childhood. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1455. - PubMed
-
- McDonnell GV, McCann JP. Why do adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus die? A clinic-based study. Eur J Pediatr Surg, suppl. 2000;10:31. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
