Do NIA-AA criteria distinguish Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia?

Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Feb;11(2):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.516. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

Abstract

Background: Clinical criteria are important for improving diagnostic accuracy and ensuring comparability of patient cohorts in research studies.

Objective: The aim was to assess the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).

Methods: Two hundred twelve consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed AD or FTLD who were clinically assessed in a specialist cognitive unit were identified. Fifty-five patients were excluded predominantly because of insufficient clinical information. Anonymized clinical data were rated against the NIA-AA criteria by raters who were blinded to clinical and pathologic diagnosis.

Results: The NIA-AA AD dementia criteria had a sensitivity of 65.6% for probable and 79.5% for possible AD and a specificity of 95.2% and 94.0% for probable and possible, respectively.

Conclusion: In patients with FTLD and predominantly early-onset AD, the NIA-AA AD dementia criteria have high specificity but lower sensitivity. The high specificity is due to the broad exclusion criteria.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Criteria; Dementia; Diagnosis; Neuropathology; Pathology.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Alzheimer Disease / diagnosis*
  • Alzheimer Disease / pathology
  • Brain / pathology
  • Cohort Studies
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • False Negative Reactions
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Female
  • Frontotemporal Dementia / diagnosis*
  • Frontotemporal Dementia / pathology
  • Health Status Indicators*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • National Institute on Aging (U.S.)
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • United States