Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear filters
. 2014 Jul;12(4):338-43.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1642.

Changes in office visit use associated with electronic messaging and telephone encounters among patients with diabetes in the PCMH

Affiliations

Changes in office visit use associated with electronic messaging and telephone encounters among patients with diabetes in the PCMH

David T Liss et al. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Telephone- and Internet-based communication are increasingly common in primary care, yet there is uncertainty about how these forms of communication affect demand for in-person office visits. We assessed whether use of copay-free secure messaging and telephone encounters was associated with office visit use in a population with diabetes.

Methods: We used an interrupted time series design with a patient-quarter unit of analysis. Secondary data from 2008-2011 spanned 3 periods before, during, and after a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) redesign in an integrated health care delivery system. We used linear regression models to estimate proportional changes in the use of primary care office visits associated with proportional increases in secure messaging and telephone encounters.

Results: The study included 18,486 adults with diabetes. The mean quarterly number of primary care contacts increased by 28% between the pre-PCMH baseline and the postimplementation periods, largely driven by increased secure messaging; quarterly office visit use declined by 8%. In adjusted regression analysis, 10% increases in secure message threads and telephone encounters were associated with increases of 1.25% (95% CI, 1.21%-1.29%) and 2.74% (95% CI, 2.70%-2.77%) in office visits, respectively. In an interaction model, proportional increases in secure messaging and telephone encounters remained associated with increased office visit use for all study periods and patient subpopulations (P<.001).

Conclusions: Before and after a medical home redesign, proportional increases in secure messaging and telephone encounters were associated with additional primary care office visits for individuals with diabetes. Our findings provide evidence on how new forms of patient-clinician communication may affect demand for office visits.

Keywords: communication; electronic mail; family practice; health services needs and demand; office visits; practice redesign; practice-based research; primary care; telephone; utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quarterly numbers of primary care contacts between care teams and patients with diabetes during baseline, PCMH implementation, and postimplementation periods. PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 1—scope and effectiveness. BMJ. 2004;329(7463):435–438 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Telephone consultations. BMJ. 2003;326(7396): 966–969 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown RS, Peikes D, Peterson G, Schore J, Razafindrakoto CM. Six features of Medicare coordinated care demonstration programs that cut hospital admissions of high-risk patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(6):1156–1166 - PubMed
    1. Green BB, Cook AJ, Ralston JD, et al. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(24):2857–2867 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Hoath J, Mullen M, Cheadle A, Goldberg HI. Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):234–239 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types