Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 23;5(2):416-29.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-01-RA-0002. eCollection 2014.

Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity

Affiliations

Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity

S Wells et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Personal health records (PHRs) connected to a physician's electronic health record system hold substantial promise for supporting and engaging patients with chronic disease.

Objectives: To explore how U.S. health care organizations are currently utilizing PHRs for chronic disease populations.

Methods: A mixed methods study including semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire was conducted. A purposive sample was developed of health care organizations which were recognized as exemplars for PHRs and were high performers in national patient satisfaction surveys (H-CAHPS or CAHPS). Within each organization, participants were health IT leaders or those managing high-risk or chronic disease populations.

Results: Interviews were conducted with 30 informants and completed questionnaires were received from 16 organizations (84% response rate). Most PHRs allowed patients to access health records and educational material, message their provider, renew prescriptions and request appointments. Patient generated data was increasingly being sought and combined with messaging, resulted in greater understanding of patient health and functioning outside of the clinic visit. However for chronic disease populations, there was little targeted involvement in PHR design and few tools to help interpret and manage their conditions beyond those offered for all. The PHR was largely uncoupled from high risk population management interventions and no clear framework for future PHR development emerged.

Conclusion: This technology is currently underutilized and represents a major opportunity given the potential benefits of patient engagement and shared decision making. A coherent patient-centric PHR design and evaluation strategy is required to realize its potential and maximize this natural hub for multidisciplinary care co-ordination.

Keywords: Personal health records; adoption; chronic disease; electronic health records.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

In her current role, Susan Wells is partly funded by the Stevenson Foundation and has received research grants from the Health Research Council of New Zealand, Roche Diagnostics Ltd, and from National Heart Foundation of New Zealand outside the submitted work.

David W Bates reports personal fees from SEA Medical, personal fees from Zynx, grants and personal fees from EarlySense. In addition, he has a patent on decision support software licensed to Medicalis with royalties.

Marie Dunn completed a 2013 summer internship at InterSystems Corporation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Department of Human and Health Services. HHS Initiative on Multiple Chronic Conditions. Secondary HHS Initiative on Multiple Chronic Conditions 2012. http://www.hhs.gov/ash/initiatives/mcc/
    1. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco T.Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-centered Care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993
    1. Hibbard JH, Greene J.What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Affairs 2013; 32(2): 207–214 - PubMed
    1. Legare F, Witteman HO.Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Affairs 2013; 32(2): 276–284 - PubMed
    1. Charmel P, Frampton S.Building the business case for patient centered care. Healthcare Financial Management 2008; 62: 80–85 - PubMed

Publication types