Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims
- PMID: 25040084
- PMCID: PMC4387865
- DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12777
Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims
Erratum in
- Am J Transplant. 2014 Nov;14(11):2673. Kuricka, L M [corrected to Kucirka, L M]
-
Erratum.Am J Transplant. 2014 Nov;14(11):2673. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13038. Am J Transplant. 2014. PMID: 28346977 No abstract available.
Abstract
The field of organ transplantation benefits from large, comprehensive, transplant-specific national data sets available to researchers. In addition to the widely used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)-based registries (the United Network for Organ Sharing and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data sets) and United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data sets, there are other publicly available national data sets, not specific to transplantation, which have historically been underutilized in the field of transplantation. Of particular interest are the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and State Inpatient Databases, produced by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The USRDS database provides extensive data relevant to studies of kidney transplantation. Linkage of publicly available data sets to external data sources such as private claims or pharmacy data provides further resources for registry-based research. Although these resources can transcend some limitations of OPTN-based registry data, they come with their own limitations, which must be understood to avoid biased inference. This review discusses different registry-based data sources available in the United States, as well as the proper design and conduct of registry-based research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation.
Similar articles
-
Linking the US transplant registry to administrative claims data: expanding the potential of transplant research.Med Care. 2007 Jun;45(6):529-36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180326121. Med Care. 2007. PMID: 17515780
-
Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2013 Apr;27(2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Mar 6. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2013. PMID: 23481320 Review.
-
Validity of skin cancer malignancy reporting to the Organ Procurement Transplant Network: A cohort study.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Feb;78(2):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 12. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29031659
-
Taiwan's organ donation and transplantation: Observation from national registry point of view.J Formos Med Assoc. 2017 Sep;116(9):649-651. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 22. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28342595 No abstract available.
-
Developing Statistical Models to Assess Transplant Outcomes Using National Registries: The Process in the United States.Transplantation. 2016 Feb;100(2):288-94. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000891. Transplantation. 2016. PMID: 26814440 Review.
Cited by
-
Sex and Size Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 4:e243498. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3498. Online ahead of print. JAMA Surg. 2024. PMID: 39230915
-
Center and Individual Willingness to Consider Heart and Lung Offers From Donors With Hepatitis C.J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:175-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.043. Epub 2024 Aug 3. J Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39098116
-
Components of Residential Neighborhood Deprivation and Their Impact on the Likelihood of Live-Donor and Preemptive Kidney Transplantation.Clin Transplant. 2024 Jul;38(7):e15382. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15382. Clin Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38973768
-
Design, cohort profile and comparison of the KTD-Innov study: a prospective multidimensional biomarker validation study in kidney allograft rejection.Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 May;39(5):549-564. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01112-w. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Eur J Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38625480
-
Waitlist Outcomes for Exception and Non-exception Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States Following Implementation of the Median MELD at Transplant (MMaT)/250-mile Policy.Transplantation. 2024 Aug 1;108(8):e170-e180. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004957. Epub 2024 Mar 29. Transplantation. 2024. PMID: 38548691
References
-
- Dickinson DM, Dykstra DM, Levine GN, Li S, Welch JC, Webb RL. Transplant data: sources, collection and research considerations, 2004. American Journal of Transplantation. 2005;5(4p2):850–861. - PubMed
-
- Massie AB, Zeger SL, Montgomery RA, Segev DL. The effects of DonorNet 2007 on kidney distribution equity and efficiency. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(7):1550–1557. - PubMed
-
- Segev DL, Muzaale AD, Caffo BS, Mehta SH, Singer AL, Taranto SE, et al. Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;303(10):959–966. - PubMed
-
- Dickinson D, Arrington C, Fant G, Levine G, Schaubel D, Pruett T, et al. SRTR Program-Specific Reports on Outcomes: A Guide for the New Reader. American Journal of Transplantation. 2008;8(4p2):1012–1026. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
