Development of a freeze-dried fungal wettable powder preparation able to biodegrade chlorpyrifos on vegetables

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 25;9(7):e103558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103558. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Continuous use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos has resulted in harmful contaminations in environment and species. Based on a chlorpyrifos-degrading fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides strain Hu-01 (collection number: CCTCC M 20711), a fungal wettable powder preparation was developed aiming to efficiently remove chlorpyrifos residues from vegetables. The formula was determined to be 11.0% of carboxymethyl cellulose-Na, 9.0% of polyethylene glycol 6000, 5.0% of primary alcohol ethoxylate, 2.5% of glycine, 5.0% of fucose, 27.5% of kaolin and 40% of freeze dried fungi by response surface methodology (RSM). The results of quality inspection indicated that the fungal preparation could reach manufacturing standards. Finally, the degradation of chlorpyrifos by this fungal preparation was determined on pre-harvest cabbage. Compared to the controls without fungal preparation, the degradation of chlorpyrifos on cabbages, which was sprayed with the fungal preparation, was up to 91% after 7 d. These results suggested this freeze-dried fungal wettable powder may possess potential for biodegradation of chlorpyrifos residues on vegetables and provide a potential strategy for food and environment safety against pesticide residues.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biodegradation, Environmental*
  • Biotransformation
  • Brassica / drug effects
  • Brassica / microbiology
  • Chlorpyrifos / metabolism*
  • Chlorpyrifos / toxicity
  • Cladosporium / chemistry
  • Cladosporium / metabolism*
  • Freeze Drying / methods
  • Pesticides / metabolism*
  • Pesticides / toxicity
  • Powders
  • Wettability

Substances

  • Pesticides
  • Powders
  • Chlorpyrifos

Grants and funding

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation (No.30871660 and No. 31371960) of China for the financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.