SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodelers contribute to DNA double-strand break perinuclear anchorage site choice
- PMID: 25066231
- DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.027
SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodelers contribute to DNA double-strand break perinuclear anchorage site choice
Abstract
Persistent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are recruited to the nuclear periphery in budding yeast. Both the Nup84 pore subcomplex and Mps3, an inner nuclear membrane (INM) SUN domain protein, have been implicated in DSB binding. It was unclear what, if anything, distinguishes the two potential sites of repair. Here, we characterize and distinguish the two binding sites. First, DSB-pore interaction occurs independently of cell-cycle phase and requires neither the chromatin remodeler INO80 nor recombinase Rad51 activity. In contrast, Mps3 binding is S and G2 phase specific and requires both factors. SWR1-dependent incorporation of Htz1 (H2A.Z) is necessary for break relocation to either site in both G1- and S-phase cells. Importantly, functional assays indicate that mutations in the two sites have additive repair defects, arguing that the two perinuclear anchorage sites define distinct survival pathways.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks.EMBO J. 2007 Sep 19;26(18):4113-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601835. Epub 2007 Aug 30. EMBO J. 2007. PMID: 17762868 Free PMC article.
-
The INO80 complex is required for damage-induced recombination.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Apr 13;355(3):835-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.02.036. Epub 2007 Feb 15. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007. PMID: 17320816
-
Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage.Genes Dev. 2006 Sep 1;20(17):2437-49. doi: 10.1101/gad.1440206. Genes Dev. 2006. PMID: 16951256 Free PMC article.
-
Nucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013 Apr;23(2):174-84. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 23. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013. PMID: 23352131 Review.
-
Chromatin remodeling in DNA double-strand break repair.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007 Apr;17(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Feb 22. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007. PMID: 17320375 Review.
Cited by
-
Local nucleosome dynamics and eviction following a double-strand break are reversible by NHEJ-mediated repair in the absence of DNA replication.Genome Res. 2021 May;31(5):775-788. doi: 10.1101/gr.271155.120. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Genome Res. 2021. PMID: 33811083 Free PMC article.
-
The Nature of Actin-Family Proteins in Chromatin-Modifying Complexes.Front Genet. 2018 Sep 25;9:398. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00398. eCollection 2018. Front Genet. 2018. PMID: 30319687 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lamin B1 acetylation slows the G1 to S cell cycle transition through inhibition of DNA repair.Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Feb 26;49(4):2044-2064. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021. PMID: 33533922 Free PMC article.
-
Collaborations between chromatin and nuclear architecture to optimize DNA repair fidelity.DNA Repair (Amst). 2021 Jan;97:103018. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.103018. Epub 2020 Nov 22. DNA Repair (Amst). 2021. PMID: 33285474 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nuclear F-actin assembly on damaged chromatin is regulated by DYRK1A and Spir1 phosphorylation.Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Aug 27;52(15):8897-8912. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae574. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024. PMID: 38966995 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
