Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty
- PMID: 25082711
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.06.010
Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty
Abstract
Objective: We sought to determine current and longitudinal trends in the usage of open (OP), laparoscopic (LP), and robotic pyeloplasties. (RALP) Furthermore, we aimed to describe patient and hospital level characteristics associated with the use of minimally invasive pyeloplasties (MIP) and to compare basic utilization metrics for each approach.
Materials/methods: The 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009 Kid's Inpatient Databases (KID) were used to determine current and longitudinal trends. As a result of a specific billing code for robotic surgery introduced in 2008, the 2009 KID database was used for analysis of RALP. Patient and hospital characteristics examined included: age, gender, race, insurance status, hospital location, and academic status. Utilization metrics of length of stay (LOS) and cost were determined from each modality.
Results: In 2009, there were 3354 pediatric pyeloplasties performed in the USA (85% OP, 3% LP, 12% RP). Compared with 2000, this represents an 11.7% decrease in the overall number of pyeloplasties but a progressive increase in MIP from 0.34% in 2000 to 11.7%. Mean patient age was 3.7 years for OP, 9.3 years for LP and 9.9 years for RALP. MIP was more commonly performed in females, Caucasians, patients with private insurance, at urban hospitals and at teaching hospitals. Although length of stay (LOS) in days was statistically lower for MIP (3.46 OP, 2.86 LP, 1.96 RP, p < 0.001), total cost between the groups was not statistically different. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, age (OR 1.17, p < 0.001) increased the odds of MIP whereas lack of private insurance decreased the odds of MIP (OR 0.62, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Although utilization of MIP is increasing in the USA, especially in older children, OP remains predominant. MIP was associated with a decrease in LOS. The odds of MIP were higher in older children, whereas the lack of private insurance decreased the odds of MIP.
Keywords: Kids' inpatient database; Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Minimally invasive pyeloplasty; Pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Robotic pyeloplasty.
Copyright © 2014 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Aug;14(4):336.e1-336.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Feb 22. J Pediatr Urol. 2018. PMID: 29530407 Free PMC article.
-
Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1141-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12039. Epub 2013 Mar 19. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23510261
-
Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):229.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 12. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 27346071
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z. Epub 2019 Sep 10. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31506749 Review.
-
A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Oct;18(5):642-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 3. J Pediatr Urol. 2022. PMID: 36117037 Review.
Cited by
-
Minimally invasive versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric population: Comparative retrospective study in tertiary centre.Urol Ann. 2024 Jul-Sep;16(3):215-217. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_101_23. Epub 2024 Jul 3. Urol Ann. 2024. PMID: 39290219 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Sep 6;39(1):265. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05541-8. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023. PMID: 37673951 Review.
-
Robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1891-1906. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01648-1. Epub 2023 Jun 13. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 37310527 Review.
-
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: Open or minimally invasive surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 23;10:1052440. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1052440. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36507128 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modified robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with long proximal ureteral stricture: The "double-flap" technique.Front Pediatr. 2022 Oct 14;10:964147. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.964147. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36313892 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
