Assessing Communities' Age-Friendliness: How Congruent Are Subjective Versus Objective Assessments?

J Appl Gerontol. 2016 May;35(5):549-65. doi: 10.1177/0733464814542612. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

Abstract

The notion of age-friendliness is gaining increasing attention from policy makers and researchers. In this study, we examine the congruence between two types of age-friendly surveys: subjective assessments by community residents versus objective assessments by municipal officials. The study was based on data from 39 mostly rural communities in Manitoba, Canada, in which a municipal official and residents (M= 25 residents per community) completed a survey to assess age-friendly features in a range of domains, such as transportation and housing. Congruence between the two surveys was generally good, although the municipal official survey consistently overestimated communities' age-friendliness, relative to residents' ratings. The findings suggest that a survey completed by municipal officials can provide a reasonable assessment of age-friendliness that may be useful for certain purposes, such as cross-community comparisons. However, some caution is warranted when using only these surveys for community development, as they may not adequately reflect residents' views.

Keywords: age-friendliness; age-friendly communities; community development; measurement; surveys.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Canada
  • Environment Design / trends*
  • Female
  • Housing*
  • Humans
  • Independent Living*
  • Male
  • Regression Analysis
  • Residence Characteristics*
  • Rural Population*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Transportation*