Geographic variation in radiologist capacity and widespread implementation of lung cancer CT screening
- PMID: 25118160
- PMCID: PMC4407799
- DOI: 10.1177/0969141314548055
Geographic variation in radiologist capacity and widespread implementation of lung cancer CT screening
Abstract
Background: Newly released United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for lung cancer screening are expected to increase demand for low-dose computed tomography scanning, but health system capacity constraints might threaten the scale-up of screening.
Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of capacity constraints in the radiologist workforce and resulting potential disparities in access to lung cancer screening.
Methods: We combined information from health interview surveys to estimate the numbers of smokers who meet the USPSTF eligibility criteria, and information from administrative datasets to estimate the numbers of radiologists and the numbers of scans they currently interpret in Health Service Areas (HSAs) nationwide. We estimated and mapped the prevalence of capacity constrained HSAs - those having a greater than 5% or greater than 25% projected increase in scans over current levels from scaling up screening - and used descriptive statistics and logistic regressions to identify HSA characteristics associated with capacity constraints.
Results: Scaling up lung cancer screening would increase imaging procedures by an average of 4% across HSAs. Of the 9.6 million eligible smokers, 1,023,943 lived in HSAs with increases of at least 5%. HSAs that were rural, with many eligible smokers, and disproportionately Hispanic or low-income smokers had significantly higher odds of facing capacity constraints.
Conclusions: Disparities in access to lung cancer screening appear likely unless policy makers target HSAs with few radiologists for additional resources. Radiologists should be able to absorb the workload imposed by lung cancer screening in most areas of the country.
Keywords: CT scan; cancer screening; health care capacity; lung cancer; radiologists.
© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Treatment capacity required for full-scale implementation of lung cancer screening in the United States.Cancer. 2019 Jun 15;125(12):2039-2048. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32026. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30811590 Free PMC article.
-
Lung Cancer Screening Registry Reveals Low-dose CT Screening Remains Heavily Underutilized.Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 May;21(3):e206-e211. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 26. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32001154
-
Evaluation of Population-Level Changes Associated With the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations in Community-Based Health Care Systems.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128176. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28176. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34636916 Free PMC article.
-
Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in a clinical setting: essential elements of a screening program.J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Mar;30(2):115-29. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000139. J Thorac Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25658476 Review.
-
Smoking behaviors among patients receiving computed tomography for lung cancer screening. Systematic review in support of the U.S. preventive services task force.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 May;11(4):619-27. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201312-460OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014. PMID: 24701999 Review.
Cited by
-
Current Evidence for a Lung Cancer Screening Program.Port J Public Health. 2024 Apr 22;42(2):133-158. doi: 10.1159/000538434. eCollection 2024 Aug. Port J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39469231 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Future of Lung Cancer Screening: Current Challenges and Research Priorities.Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Feb 16;14:637-645. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S293877. eCollection 2022. Cancer Manag Res. 2022. PMID: 35210860 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rural barriers to early lung cancer detection: Exploring access to lung cancer screening programs in New Hampshire and Vermont.Am J Surg. 2021 Apr;221(4):725-730. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jul 25. Am J Surg. 2021. PMID: 32829909 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodal Retinal Image Analysis via Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Feasibility Study.J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 13;2020:7493419. doi: 10.1155/2020/7493419. eCollection 2020. J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32411434 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Implementation of Deep Learning in Thoracic Radiology: Potential Applications and Challenges.Korean J Radiol. 2020 May;21(5):511-525. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0821. Korean J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32323497 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):638–58. - PubMed
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2010 National Healthcare Disparities Report. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2010 National Healthcare Quality Report. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011
-
- American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts & Figures 2013. American Cancer Society; Atlanta: 2013.
-
- Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Church TR, et al. Screening by Chest Radiograph and Lung Cancer Mortality: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Randomized Trial. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2011 Nov 2;306(17):1865–73. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
