Age-specific chlamydial infection among pregnant women in the United States: evidence for updated recommendations
- PMID: 25118971
- DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000166
Age-specific chlamydial infection among pregnant women in the United States: evidence for updated recommendations
Abstract
Background: In the United States, chlamydia screening has been recommended for all pregnant women by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) but only for pregnant women who are at increased risk by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Very limited evidence, such as age-specific chlamydia positivity in pregnant women, has been used to develop these recommendations.
Methods: We analyzed data from a large commercial laboratory corporation in the United States in 2013. At the first prenatal visit made by women aged 15 to 44 years for whom a chlamydia test was performed between June 2008 and July 2010, we estimated positivity of chlamydia by age, insurance coverage, geographic region, and test type.
Results: Of 601,001 pregnant women aged 15 to 44 years who had routine prenatal care, 62.9% had private insurance and 32.9% had Medicaid coverage, 60.3% resided in the South region, and 43.2% were aged 15 to 24 years, 26.8% were aged 25 to 29 years, and 19.1% were aged 30 to 34 years. Chlamydia positivity was 3.6% overall, and significantly decreased as age increased (15-19 years: 9.6 %; 20-24 years: 5.2%; 25-29 years: 1.8%; 30-34 years: 0.9%; and 35-44 years: 0.6%; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Our findings of higher positivity among younger pregnant women suggest that the yield is likely to be greater from screening younger pregnant women than from screening older pregnant women to identify chlamydia infection. The benefits of harmonizing CDC and USPSTF recommendations for pregnant women could be explored by reviewing age-specific positivity data and estimating the frequency of prenatal adverse health outcomes caused by chlamydia to develop consensus regarding the age limit for pregnant women who should be screened.
Similar articles
-
Chlamydia screening among sexually active young female enrollees of health plans--United States, 2000-2007.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Apr 17;58(14):362-5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009. PMID: 19373196
-
Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.CMAJ. 1996 Jun 1;154(11):1631-44. CMAJ. 1996. PMID: 8646651 Free PMC article.
-
Chlamydial and gonococcal testing during pregnancy in the United States.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):55.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.027. Epub 2012 Apr 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22621817
-
Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. To screen or not to screen?Can Fam Physician. 1993 Jan;39:97-102. Can Fam Physician. 1993. PMID: 8435566 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening for chlamydial infection: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 17;147(2):135-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00173. Epub 2007 Jun 18. Ann Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17576995 Review.
Cited by
-
Chlamydia trachomatis Is Associated With Medically Indicated Preterm Birth and Preeclampsia in Young Pregnant Women.Sex Transm Dis. 2020 Apr;47(4):246-252. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001134. Sex Transm Dis. 2020. PMID: 32004256 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and Risk of Gastroschisis.Birth Defects Res. 2017 May 1;109(8):543-549. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1001. Epub 2017 Feb 24. Birth Defects Res. 2017. PMID: 28398639 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
