Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;261(3):443-4.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000850.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism outcomes measure: analytic exploration of potential misclassification of hospital quality due to surveillance bias

Affiliations

Postoperative venous thromboembolism outcomes measure: analytic exploration of potential misclassification of hospital quality due to surveillance bias

Jeanette W Chung et al. Ann Surg. 2015 Mar.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hypothetical Illustration of Hospital Misclassification Due to Surveillance Bias in PSI12
Figure 1 illustrates hypothetical PSI12 and VTE imaging rates for two hypothetical hospitals, “X” and “Z.” The x-axis shows the number of patients in the denominator. The primary y-axis shows the true underlying incidence of clinically-significant VTE (dark-shaded region) and subclinical VTE (light-shaded region) per 100 patients in the denominator. The secondary y-axis shows the number of patients that receive VTE imaging per 100 patients in the denominator. By construction, Hospital-X has better VTE outcomes (20% incidence of clinically-significant VTE) than Hospital-Z (40% incidence of clinically-significant VTE). Both hospitals have 30% incidence of subclinical VTE. At 10% surveillance rates (LINE A), both hospitals have the same PSI12 rate: 10%. This is misleading because both hospitals are not of equal quality, and because this underestimates true underlying incidence of clinically-significant VTE in both hospitals (Hospital-X: 20%; Hospital-Z: 40%). At 20% surveillance rates (LINE B), both hospitals have PSI12 rates of 20%. Again, this is misleading because both hospitals are not equal, and because this is an underestimate of Hospital-Z's true VTE incidence. At 40% surveillance (LINE C), both hospitals have PSI12 rates of 40%. This is misleading because it inflates the incidence of clinically-significant VTE in Hospital-X by capturing 20 cases of subclinical VTE. At 100% screening (LINE D), Hospital-X has a PSI12 rate of 50% and Hospital-Z has a PSI12 rate of 70%. While this accurately shows Hospital-X to have better VTE outcomes than Hospital-Z, both PSI12 rates are inflated estimates of the true underlying incidence of clinically-significant VTE in each hospital due to surveillance bias and the inability to identify and exclude subclinical VTE from the numerator of PSI12.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bilimoria KY, Chung J, Ju MH, et al. Evaluation of surveillance bias and the validity of the venous thromboembolism quality measure. JAMA. 2013;310:1482–1489. - PubMed
    1. Suh JM, Cronan JJ, Healey TT. Dots are not clots: the over-diagnosis and over-treatment of PE. Emerg Radiol. 2010;17:347–352. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators #12, Technical Specifications, Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism or Deep Vein Thrombosis Rate. [Accessed April 28, 2014]; Available at: www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov.

Publication types

MeSH terms