Survival of transcatheter mitral valve repair compared with surgical and conservative treatment in high-surgical-risk patients
- PMID: 25147032
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.171
Survival of transcatheter mitral valve repair compared with surgical and conservative treatment in high-surgical-risk patients
Abstract
Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare survival between transcatheter mitral valve (MV) repair using MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California), MV-surgery, and conservative treatment in high-surgical-risk patients symptomatic with severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR).
Background: Up to 50% of patients with symptomatic severe MR are denied for surgery due to high perioperative risk. Transcatheter MV repair might be an alternative.
Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 139) treated with transcatheter MV repair were included. Comparator surgically (n = 53) and conservatively (n = 59) treated patients were identified retrospectively. Surgical risk was based on the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (log EuroSCORE) or the presence of relevant risk factors, as judged by the heart team.
Results: The log EuroSCORE was higher in the transcatheter MV repair group (23.9 ± 16.1%) than in the surgically (14.2 ± 8.9%) and conservatively (18.7 ± 13.2%, p < 0.0001) treated patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in surgical patients (43.9 ± 14.4%, p = 0.003), with similar values for the transcatheter MV repair (36.8 ± 15.3%) and conservatively treated (34.5 ± 16.5%) groups. After 1 year of follow-up, the transcatheter MV repair and surgery groups showed similar survival rates (85.8% and 85.2%, respectively), whereas 67.7% of conservatively treated patients survived. The same trend was observed after the second and third years. After weighting for propensity score and controlling for risk factors, both the transcatheter MV repair (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.78, p = 0.006) and surgical (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.88, p = 0.014) groups showed better survival than the conservatively treated group. The transcatheter MV repair and surgical groups did not differ (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.16, p = 0.430).
Conclusions: Despite a higher log EuroSCORE, high-surgical-risk patients with symptomatic severe MR treated with transcatheter MV repair show similar survival rates compared with surgically treated patients, with both displaying survival benefit compared with conservative treatment.
Keywords: heart failure; mitral valve; mortality; valvuloplasty.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The saga continues: does mitral valve repair improve survival in secondary mitral regurgitation?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):882-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.009. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 25147033 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with ischaemic mitral regurgitation and depressed ejection fraction: risk factors for early and mid-term mortality†.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):64-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu066. Epub 2014 Mar 27. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24676552
-
Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After MitraClip Implantation Deteriorates Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Heart Failure.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 8;10(9):931-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.280. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28473116
-
Outcomes in mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflets a multicenter European study.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Mar;1(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.005. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008. PMID: 19356418
-
MitraClip for severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation in patients at high surgical risk: a comprehensive systematic review.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):581-90. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25564. Epub 2014 Jul 2. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24905665 Review.
-
Current status of transcatheter mitral valve repair therapies - From surgical concepts towards future directions.Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016 Oct-Dec;50(5-6):367-376. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2016.1248482. Epub 2016 Nov 6. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016. PMID: 27733069 Review.
Cited by
-
Insight from International Guidelines: do We Have Satisfactory Recommendations for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation?Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 17;23(5):180. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2305180. eCollection 2022 May. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39077618 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The evolution of technical prerequisites and local boundary conditions for optimization of mitral valve interventions-Emphasis on skills development and institutional risk performance.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 21;10:1101337. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1101337. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37547244 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Looking towards the future: patient-specific computational modeling to optimize outcomes for transcatheter mitral valve repair.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 24;10:1140379. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1140379. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37168656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: Competitive or Complementary?J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 13;11(12):3377. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123377. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35743448 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Valve Repair in Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation.J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):90. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010090. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35055405 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
