Systematic review of hypertension clinical practice guidelines based on the burden of disease: a global perspective
- PMID: 25155567
- DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12082
Systematic review of hypertension clinical practice guidelines based on the burden of disease: a global perspective
Abstract
Objective: To perform a systematic review for the development, geographical distribution, and subject classification of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for hypertension worldwide.
Methods: CPGs for the management of hypertension were identified through the searching of Ovid, EMbase, and Chinese electronic databases. Major guidelines websites such as NGC (National Guideline Clearinghouse), GIN (Guidelines International Network), NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) and CPGN (Clinical Practice Guideline Network), as well as Google Scholar were also screened for additional information. EndNote X3 and Excel 2007 were used for extracting and analyzing the data of included CPGs.
Results: A total of 375 hypertension CPGs were included, involving 6 continents, 33 countries, 4 regions, and 3 international organizations. The publication date ranged from the year of 1971 to 2012, with the number of CPGs increased year by year. The CPGs were mainly developed by North America, Europe, and Asia. Their subjects covered 3 categories and 11 sub-classes, which mainly focused on the management of adult hypertension (44.53%).
Conclusion: The number of CPGs varies in regions, countries, and academic organizations, with the development process differently. The regional disparity between the number CPGs and burden of hypertension were observed. The CPGs made a point of the management of adult hypertension.
Keywords: Clinical practice guideline; hypertension; systematic review.
© 2014 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Appraisal of the Quality and Contents of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension Management in Chinese Medicine: A Systematic Review.Chin J Integr Med. 2018 Jul;24(7):545-550. doi: 10.1007/s11655-016-2277-8. Epub 2016 Dec 9. Chin J Integr Med. 2018. PMID: 27933511 Review.
-
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension: Evaluation of Quality Using the AGREE II Instrument.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2016 Dec;16(6):439-451. doi: 10.1007/s40256-016-0183-2. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2016. PMID: 27580999
-
Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for assisted reproductive technology using the RIGHT checklist: A cross-sectional study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Oct;241:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.039. Epub 2019 Aug 7. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 31419695
-
Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for treating pancreatic cancer based on the global disease burden.J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12140. J Evid Based Med. 2015. PMID: 25594942 Review.
-
A systematic review of guidelines for lymphedema and the need for contemporary intersocietal guidelines for the management of lymphedema.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jul;8(4):676-684. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 May 20. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020. PMID: 32444277
Cited by
-
Trajectories of Outpatient Service Utilisation of Hypertensive Patients in Tertiary Hospitals in China.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;17(3):852. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030852. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32013261 Free PMC article.
-
Mandatory implementation of NICE Guidelines for the care of bipolar disorder and other conditions in England and Wales.BMC Med. 2015 Sep 30;13:246. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0464-7. BMC Med. 2015. PMID: 26420497 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
