Contained power morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag
- PMID: 25162248
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000421
Contained power morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag
Abstract
Objective: To describe a technique for contained power morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag at the time of uterine specimen removal during minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.
Methods: Over the study period of January 2013 to April 2014, 73 patients underwent morcellation of the uterus or myomas within an insufflated isolation bag at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy. This technique involves placing the specimen into a large plastic bag within the abdomen, exteriorizing the opening of the bag, insufflating the bag within the peritoneal cavity, and then using a power morcellator within the bag to remove the specimen in a contained fashion. Procedures were performed at four institutions and included multiport laparoscopy, single-site laparoscopy, multiport robot-assisted laparoscopy, or single-site robot-assisted laparoscopy. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected for the cases.
Results: Surgical specimen morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag was successfully used in all cases. The median operative time was 114 minutes (range 32-380 minutes), median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range 10-500 mL), and the median specimen weight was 257 g (range 53-1,481 g). There were no complications related to the contained morcellation technique nor was there visual evidence of tissue dissemination outside of the isolation bag.
Conclusion: Morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag is a feasible technique. Methods for morcellating uterine tissue in a contained manner may provide an option to minimize the risks of open power morcellation while preserving the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.
Level of evidence: II.
Comment in
-
Mitigating risks of specimen extraction: is in-bag power morcellation an answer?Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):489-490. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000434. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25162247 No abstract available.
-
Contained power morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag.Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):229. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000614. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25560131 No abstract available.
-
In reply.Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):229-230. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000615. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25560132 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Contained Morcellation for Laparoscopic Myomectomy Within a Specially Designed Bag.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):257-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 7. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26260302
-
Open power morcellation versus contained power morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag: comparison of perioperative outcomes.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):433-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 29. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25452122
-
The Sydney Contained In Bag Morcellation technique.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):984-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 15. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25048565
-
Laparoscopic power morcellation of presumed fibroids.Minerva Ginecol. 2016 Jun;68(3):352-63. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Minerva Ginecol. 2016. PMID: 26799759 Review.
-
Electric morcellation-related reoperations after laparoscopic myomectomy and nonmyomectomy procedures.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb;22(2):163-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 11. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25218993 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors affecting gasless reduced-port laparoscopic myomectomy (GRP-LM) using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting method: a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of 966 cases in Japan.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07706-9. Online ahead of print. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39249518
-
In-bag extraction of tissue through an incision in the posterior vaginal wall in laparoscopic myomectomy: a large retrospective study.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 27;23(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02780-8. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 38012692 Free PMC article.
-
Contained Power Morcellation in Laparoscopic Uterine Myoma Surgeries: A Brief Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 7;11(18):2481. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182481. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37761678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of leakage with a new detachable multi-hard-port containment system for power morcellation during gynecologic laparoscopy: An in vitro study.BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02124-1. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 37525186 Free PMC article.
-
The Future of Minimal-Access Myoma Surgery with In-Bag Contained Morcellation.J Clin Med. 2023 May 23;12(11):3628. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113628. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37297823 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Steiner RA, Wight E, Tadir Y, Haller U. Electrical cutting device for laparoscopic removal of tissue from the abdominal cavity. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:471–4.
-
- Carter JE, McCarus SD. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Time and cost analysis of power vs. manual morcellation. J Reprod Med 1997;42:383–8.
-
- Milad MP, Milad EA. Laparoscopic morcellator-related complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:486–91.
-
- Lieng M, Istre O, Busund B, Qvigstad E. Severe complications caused by retained tissue in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:231–3.
-
- Hutchins FL Jr, Reinoehl EM. Retained myoma after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5:293–5.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
